![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It was correct data at the time of the posting and calculation of the probables. It's technically not a will pay... it's a probable. An additional scratch of any other horse live to the Jackpot between its initial cycle and race time would have had the same impact.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Just one more note... this was all a nasty set of circumstances that I wish never would have happened. I know of partners who have six figures worth of reasons to agree and another who might not because he/she backed into a $12k payoff. That said, because it happened, we can now look to make adjustments going forward.
I do think there is a general public perception that those who run racing don't care. We see it all the time with the endless barrage of jabs toward NYRA and other racing entities. In reality, I have never met anyone who works at a racetrack that doesn't care about the sport or wants it to succeed, and the same applies here. I promise you that everyone in my office, in our racing office and beyond would have rather seen the Jackpot get distributed versus having to deal with what happened. But like I said, hopefully we can figure out the right solution and get it implemented as soon as possible. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That said, in this case, I don't attribute the result to either: it's one of the unintended consequences of these relatively new jackpot-type wagers. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I do think he was sort of stuck in "switchboard" land at one point... sometimes they have a hard time figuring out where to send racing guests. But everyone here knows... I like to play the races too and so I totally understood what he was going through and promised him I would find the answer. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure anyone's feelings at that time could be an accurate depiction of what happened. |