Breeders' Cup 2014

10 pnt move up · #1 06-11-2013, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716

I am and have always been against Monmouth getting it (and it's my home track). That being said, it's extremely unfair to blame for the so-called debacle. They just had extremely bad luck with the weather and in my opinion with the cards that they were dealt, they did a pretty admirable job.

I see lots of posts about the weather in this thread, what happened at Monmouth is a component of the selection.

That had to be the worst BC ever, the track was totally ill prepared for that kind of weather.

MaTH716 · #2 06-11-2013, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

I see lots of posts about the weather in this thread, what happened at Monmouth is a component of the selection.

That had to be the worst BC ever, the track was totally ill prepared for that kind of weather.

How do you prepare for a monsoon? That's basically what the conditions were on Friday. If it wasn't the Breeder's Cup that Friday card would have be canceled in a heartbeat cause the weather was so bad.

cmorioles · #3 06-11-2013, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

I see lots of posts about the weather in this thread, what happened at Monmouth is a component of the selection.

That had to be the worst BC ever, the track was totally ill prepared for that kind of weather.

The results seemed fine. What was so bad about the racing, other than some people got wet?

Danzig · #4 06-11-2013, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

The results seemed fine. What was so bad about the racing, other than some people got wet?

Conrad · #5 06-11-2013, 11:31 AM

Overcast and 55 degrees with a little give in the ground is just fine with the horses
It's their show

Clip-Clop · #6 06-11-2013, 11:45 AM

The BC at Monmouth was just about as formful as racing can be. Outside of a breakdown on the card, which happens everywhere, nothing on the track was bad or shocking or appeared to be altered much by the rain.

cakes44 · #7 06-11-2013, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles

The results seemed fine. What was so bad about the racing, other than some people got wet?

EXACTLY...one of the most formful BCs in recent history. There were zero winners you couldn't make a case for after looking back at the form. Churchill is always good for 2-3 WTFs.

Revidere · #8 06-11-2013, 01:23 PM

Didn't have any issues with Monmouth either.

I could also see Del Mar as host if Joe Harper pulls the plug on poly. I think the track surface is why Arlington and Woodbine do not get the event.

Danzig · #9 06-11-2013, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revidere

Didn't have any issues with Monmouth either.

I could also see Del Mar as host if Joe Harper pulls the plug on poly. I think the track surface is why Arlington and Woodbine do not get the event.

except santa anita had poly and still got it.

Revidere · #10 06-11-2013, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

except santa anita had poly and still got it.

Actually it was cushion track but more to the point that not one main track winner prepped on dirt and you had several turf horses winning on the main, I think that was enough to have them be skeptical of having the event at another all weather surface venue.

Danzig · #11 06-11-2013, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revidere

Actually it was cushion track but more to the point that not one main track winner prepped on dirt and you had several turf horses winning on the main, I think that was enough to have them be skeptical of having the event at another all weather surface venue.

hey, wouldn't break my heart to never see it on an awt.