2013 Master's Contest - Page 3

TheSpyder · #41 04-11-2013, 04:45 PM

Will come out of the time tunnel!

Quote:

Originally Posted by keithting

J. Nicklaus
R. Floyd
B. Crenshaw

keithting · #42 04-11-2013, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpyder

Will come out of the time tunnel!

Hey, if there was an alternate pick, it would be H. Irwin....

Tough decision tonight - watch the Master's or Sopranos rerun !!!!

Crown@club · #43 04-12-2013, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keithting

Hey, if there was an alternate pick, it would be H. Irwin....

Tough decision tonight - watch the Master's or Sopranos rerun !!!!

Why not Trevino?

ateamstupid · #44 04-12-2013, 11:36 AM

I've had a blast watching this Guan kid play so far. Would love to see him make the cut.

Alabama Stakes · #45 04-12-2013, 02:17 PM

some idiot euro just penalized him a stroke for slow play on 17. Geez Louise

GBBob · #46 04-12-2013, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob

Dustin Johnson
Keegan Bradley
Tiger Woods

Johnson +6 over last 5 holes today

docicu3 · #47 04-12-2013, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBBob

Johnson +6 over last 5 holes today

Bob .....

Does Tiger have a chance of being DQ'd in the AM for signing an inappropriate score card because of the drop he took after hitting that pin that ending up taking a bath......?

Apparently someone watching the telecast at home raised the issue tonight with CBS that Woods did not carry out the ball drop and penalty in accordance with the rule for one of the three legit options that allow a player to continue play with penalty on a hole when the ball ends up unplayable after crossing the line to a water hazzard.

The question CBS is raising is whether Tiger's card is signed with the correct overall score associated with the infraction potentially bringing DQ into the equation......Can't they eliminate these arm chair idiots from affecting major golf tournaments? After what happened to Johnson a few years back at the course with the 7000 sand traps have they not learned anything about the potential for these disasters?

Alabama Stakes · #48 04-13-2013, 12:25 AM

i like my chances in this contest. cant wait for the threepeat in the Spa contest

Rupert Pupkin · #49 04-13-2013, 02:45 AM

Did you guys see how much tickets are going for? If you can find a ticket, they're going for $3,000-$4,000 for a one-day pass. A pass for all 4 days will cost you well over $12,000. A ticket to the Masters has got to be the most expensive ticket in sports.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/golf-d...666--golf.html

GPK · #50 04-13-2013, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docicu3

Bob .....

Does Tiger have a chance of being DQ'd in the AM for signing an inappropriate score card because of the

op he took after hitting that pin that ending up taking a bath......?

Apparently someone watching the telecast at home raised the issue tonight with CBS that Woods did not carry out the ball drop and penalty in accordance with the rule for one of the three legit options that allow a player to continue play with penalty on a hole when the ball ends up unplayable after crossing the line to a water hazzard.

The question CBS is raising is whether Tiger's card is signed with the correct overall score associated with the infraction potentially bringing DQ into the equation......Can't they eliminate these arm chair idiots from affecting major golf tournaments? After what happened to Johnson a few years back at the course with the 7000 sand traps have they not learned anything about the potential for these disasters?

He technically can be DQd. The option he chose was one of the 3 options he had available to him, he just didn't execute the drop properly

GPK · #51 04-13-2013, 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alabama Stakes

some idiot euro just penalized him a stroke for slow play on 17. Geez Louise

Euro rules officials don't mess around. The kid was warned 3 times. Wish American rules officials had some backbone to them. Paramor would penalize his ailing grandmother for slow play. The guy pratically worshipped the ground that Seve walked on, yet even he wasn't immune to being given shots by him for slow play.

Rupert Pupkin · #52 04-13-2013, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK

He technically can be DQd. The option he chose was one of the 3 options he had available to him, he just didn't execute the drop properly

If you watch the replay, it looked like he dropped it within about a club length. You could see where his previous divot was and it looked like the drop was about 3-4 feet behind that. That is within a club length. Isn't that a legal drop?

GPK · #53 04-13-2013, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

If you watch the replay, it looked like he dropped it within about a club length. You could see where his previous divot was and it looked like the drop was about 3-4 feet behind that. That is within a club length. Isn't that a legal drop?

The rule states as near as posssible to the spot last played from. He def could have dropped it closer than what he did.

Danzig · #54 04-13-2013, 08:57 AM

no dq. two stroke penalty. that's according to an update to my husbands phone...

Payson Dave · #55 04-13-2013, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK

The rule states as near as posssible to the spot last played from. He def could have dropped it closer than what he did.

Ray Paulick has a couple of great tweets on this subject...

GPK · #56 04-13-2013, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Payson Dave

Ray Paulick has a couple of great tweets on this subject...

Yeah...and I didn't realize he used to be in the program.

Rupert Pupkin · #57 04-13-2013, 02:16 PM

It was Tiger's statement that got him the penalty. His drop was close enough to where he hit the original shot from, that he was not going to get any penalty. But when Tiger made the statement that he intentionally dropped the ball a yard or two further back, that was what got him the penalty. It was the "intent" that got him the penalty.

There are situations (like when a ball goes directly in the water) where a player is allowed to drop as far back as he wants. But in this case where the ball was on dry land on the other side of the water, before it went in the water, then the player does not have the choice to go back as far as he wants.

GPK · #58 04-13-2013, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

It was Tiger's statement that got him the penalty. His drop was close enough to where he hit the original shot from, that he was not going to get any penalty. But when Tiger made the statement that he intentionally dropped the ball a yard or two further back, that was what got him the penalty. It was the "intent" that got him the penalty.

There are situations (like when a ball goes directly in the water) where a player is allowed to drop as far back as he wants. But in this case where the ball was on dry land on the other side of the water, before it went in the water, then the player does not have the choice to go back as far as he wants.

Yes he does.

Rupert Pupkin · #59 04-13-2013, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK

Yes he does.

I understand now. He could have gone back as far as he wanted from the point of entry. But he did not choose that option. He chose the option to hit it from the same spot. If he's going to hit it from the same spot, then he can't go as far back as he wants. He has to try to drop it in the same spot.

GPK · #60 04-13-2013, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

I understand now. He could have gone back as far as he wanted from the point of entry. But he did not choose that option. He chose the option to hit it from the same spot. If he's going to hit it from the same spot, then he can't go as far back as he wants. He has to try to drop it in the same spot.

Yeah, that option is available with regular water hazards but not with lateral water hazards.