Roll Tide Roll Tide Roll Tide Roll Tide Roll Tide

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

NOTRE DAME 13.... BAMA 26.... GEORGIA SOMEWHERE IN THE 60'S.
THATS THE SCHEDULE STRENGTH NUMBERS. JUST STOP, PLEASE.

exactly.

Strength of Schedule isnt something to go against ND with considering Bama had one of the softest SEC schedules ever.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Here are the lines issued by Bovada.lv for each of the top-10 SEC teams, with the assumed "vs. Notre Dame on a neutral field" after each:

Alabama -9.5

Georgia -3

Florida -1.5

LSU -3

Texas A&M -3.5


http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...to-5-sec-teams

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

exactly.

Strength of Schedule isnt something to go against ND with considering Bama had one of the softest SEC schedules ever.

when i was discussing sos, i was thinking along the lines of other teams in the top ten, who played tougher.
not sure why a critique of notre dame is automatically considered a point gained for 'bama.

[Cannon Shell]

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/...mpionship-game

[IrishofNDMan]

Originally Posted by Danzig

when i was discussing sos, i was thinking along the lines of other teams in the top ten, who played tougher.
not sure why a critique of notre dame is automatically considered a point gained for 'bama.

Probably because you were bitching that nd had a schedule that fell apart and ended up being easy to navigate through, yet u never brought up Bama or Georgia and their schedules or bitched about them not deserving a shot at the national championship.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by IrishofNDMan

Probably because you were bitching that nd had a schedule that fell apart and ended up being easy to navigate through, yet u never brought up Bama or Georgia and their schedules or bitched about them not deserving a shot at the national championship.

So now its all bitching. Call me crazy, but i bet if i had an outie and not an innie, you wouldn't put it that way.

You might want to re-read the entire thread for context. And yes, after the fact you know for sure what is what. Its why ala and ga ended up with an easier schedule than lsu and fla for instance.
And i said all along that nd had a fairly easy schedule, you are the one who said all along that it was not.
Do i feel it is correct for bama and ga being 2 nd 3? Yes. And while you peruse the results from the 3 top teams, why don't you take note of margins of victory for those schedules? I have not said ga and bama had it harder than nd...but like i said before bama certainly toyed with their easy rivals, while dame was all out to win by a nostril fairly often.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Danzig

So now its all bitching. Call me crazy, but i bet if i had an outie and not an innie, you wouldn't put it that way.

You might want to re-read the entire thread for context. And yes, after the fact you know for sure what is what. Its why ala and ga ended up with an easier schedule than lsu and fla for instance.
And i said all along that nd had a fairly easy schedule, you are the one who said all along that it was not.
Do i feel it is correct for bama and ga being 2 nd 3? Yes. And while you peruse the results from the 3 top teams, why don't you take note of margins of victory for those schedules? I have not said ga and bama had it harder than nd...but like i said before bama certainly toyed with their easy rivals, while dame was all out to win by a nostril fairly often.

Why do you pretend to know so much about everything? Then make fake lists and your reassons are... They suck and 1 line BS.

[brockguy]

Irish fans should thank me for this season - I think me and my friend were like the only true Irish people at the Aviva stadium when this great season started. They should start every year here

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Why do you pretend to know so much about everything? Then make fake lists and your reassons are... They suck and 1 line BS.

coming on here and giving my opinion doesn't mean i think i know everything. note that i very seldom give picks on horses, as i do not pretend to be a good handicapper. nor do i have the time to involve myself in that enough to become one.
and, what fake lists? any lists i put up on here came from a site, or are linked. no one asked me to give a list of top ten, and my opinion is just as valid as anyone else's. i don't proclaim to have a better or worse one.

oh, and gfy. you don't like me, i don't like you, so just put me back on that ignore list you said i was on. besides, if you were a 'man' of your word, you wouldn't be on here to suffer thru my posts anyway.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by Danzig

coming on here and giving my opinion doesn't mean i think i know everything. note that i very seldom give picks on horses, as i do not pretend to be a good handicapper. nor do i have the time to involve myself in that enough to become one.
and, what fake lists? any lists i put up on here came from a site, or are linked. no one asked me to give a list of top ten, and my opinion is just as valid as anyone else's. i don't proclaim to have a better or worse one.

oh, and gfy. you don't like me, i don't like you, so just put me back on that ignore list you said i was on. besides, if you were a 'man' of your word, you wouldn't be on here to suffer thru my posts anyway.

danzig knows some stuff.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Danzig

coming on here and giving my opinion doesn't mean i think i know everything. note that i very seldom give picks on horses, as i do not pretend to be a good handicapper. nor do i have the time to involve myself in that enough to become one.
and, what fake lists? any lists i put up on here came from a site, or are linked. no one asked me to give a list of top ten, and my opinion is just as valid as anyone else's. i don't proclaim to have a better or worse one.

oh, and gfy. you don't like me, i don't like you, so just put me back on that ignore list you said i was on. besides, if you were a 'man' of your word, you wouldn't be on here to suffer thru my posts anyway.

You think you know everything and you suck up to certain people. Say what you want, but its fact.
You know what else.... Your post is typical woman behavior. Play the victim. Suffer through your posts? Where did I say that? You actually insult me the most on here, more then Hoss. Its fine..... Ignore list, hmm like I said was not you. If It was you why would I not just say it was you, what does it matter? Man of my word? Ok you got me there. But like I told your BFF Hoss earlier. I would be happy to hand him his $200. That would have to go a little bit towards me clearing some things up. Funny no response on that 1.

[IrishofNDMan]

Originally Posted by Danzig

So now its all bitching. Call me crazy, but i bet if i had an outie and not an innie, you wouldn't put it that way.

You might want to re-read the entire thread for context. And yes, after the fact you know for sure what is what. Its why ala and ga ended up with an easier schedule than lsu and fla for instance.
And i said all along that nd had a fairly easy schedule, you are the one who said all along that it was not.
Do i feel it is correct for bama and ga being 2 nd 3? Yes. And while you peruse the results from the 3 top teams, why don't you take note of margins of victory for those schedules? I have not said ga and bama had it harder than nd...but like i said before bama certainly toyed with their easy rivals, while dame was all out to win by a nostril fairly often.

I don't care whether you have an outtie, innie, or both honestly. I would have said bitching regardless. I like to debate and argue with you for fun, I have no problem on here with you though.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by IrishofNDMan

I don't care whether you have an outtie, innie, or both honestly. I would have said bitching regardless. I like to debate and argue with you for fun, I have no problem on here with you though.

no worries.

like i said, best of luck in the big game. all the discussion aside, they did what they had to do to get there, and deserve to be in.