we are back...

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

So was Romney.

Where did you hear that? It's impossible. How could he have been against something that he had no knowledge of? How could he have been against a mission that he didn't know existed?

Where did you come up with that?

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

Where did you hear that? It's impossible. How could he have been against something that he had no knowledge of? How could he have been against a mission that he didn't know existed?

Where did you come up with that?

It wasn't Faux News...

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by bigrun

It wasn't Faux News...

I think there some commercial with Bill Clinton that the Democrats were running where Clinton was saying that he didn't think Romney would have gone after Bin Laden. Maybe that is what Ateam was referring to. I guess if Bill Clinton say that he doesn't think Romney would have killed Bin Laden, then it must be true.

Romney would not have killed Bin Laden. Do you know how I know? Bill Clinton said so. LOL.

I guess the rationale was that there was some Romney interview where he was asked about Bin Laden, terrorism, and the war on terror, etc. Romney said something to the effect that it wasn't just about one guy (Bin Laden), and that there was more to the war on terror than just killing Bin Laden. The democrats then twisted that into "Romney would not have gone after Bin Laden."