![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Wow. This unsubstantiated lie just won me over. How could I have been so blind?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Amazing how much bullsti.t she pulls out of her asz, and parades it as fact.
Now it's 4.6 million jobs? Gee, Obama only took credit for 4.5 million, and that was laughed away when proven by fact that when the dust settled, it was only 300K. Oh, that cost almost a trillion dollars. Where did this latest flood of jobs come from? I'm guessing you had some accounting help by the 99.9% of economists that also supposedly believe the cool trillion was worth it. SMH. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() on the bolded, what?! http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/...timulus-worked "But in a survey by the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, 80 percent of the 40 or so economists surveyed agreed with the Congressional Budget Office, known as the CBO, that the unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without the stimulus law. The survey asked a second question about whether—accounting for future costs arising from financing the stimulus with debt—its benefits would end up exceeding its costs. Here, 46 percent thought that they would and another 27 percent were uncertain, leaving only a small percentage that did not." .........so, less than half think it will turn out to have been beneficial long-term. yeah, i haven't seen 99.9% anywhere. obviously a made up figure. that can't be! ![]() and i found this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...bibJ_blog.html "If you ask the Obama administration, economists are virtually united in thinking the 2009 stimulus package worked. “I’m absolutely convinced, and the vast majority of economists are convinced, that the steps we took in the Recovery Act saved millions of people their jobs or created a whole bunch of jobs,” Obama declared at a press conference last month. Or, to quote NEC chair Gene Sperling from an interview a few weeks ago, “There is no question that the evidence is showing that the type of things the president did to help state and local governments really mattered, were really helpful in pulling us from the brink of depression to a recovery.” But the stimulus’ critics allege that this evidence isn’t reliable. The studies the administration is relying on depend on models that “substitute assumptions for identification,” Harvard economist Robert Barro writes today in the Wall Street Journal. “To figure out the economic effects of transfers one needs ‘experiments,’” Barro writes, “in which the government changes transfer in an unusual way—while other factors stay the same—but these events are rare.” The truth is, both studies of the type Barro prefers, and studies using models, which he criticizes, have been conducted to determine the effect of the stimulus on employment and output. Of the nine studies I’ve found, six find that the stimulus had a significant, positive effect on employment and growth, and three find that the effect was either quite small or impossible to detect." not exactly 99.9%....
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln Last edited by Danzig : 09-25-2012 at 08:51 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
as long as folks go with the two big parties, we will continue to deal with all this bs. we need to all vote C. everyone. just think what would happen if the dems and reps both were kicked to the curb! my oh my. that would be awesome. won't happen. too many, on each side, still thinks their side is the one. wrong. both parties are owned by the same group of people. most big corporations donate similar amounts to both parties to hedge their bets. like gore vidal said, people need to recognize there aren't two parties. there is one party, run for 4% of the people.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion...ial/57837680/1 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
it irritates me that they still only have two candidates in these debates. but those with the money have the say so.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Words have meanings, you know.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I dunno, I guess when you are a shill, words don't have the same meaning. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Because it seems to me you are repeating a long-disproven RW talking point, that is referring actually to the ongoing cost of our debt created by George Bush (and previous to him), having zero to do with whoever is president now. You are merely quoting a chart of our national debt, and falsely assuming and falsely attributing that anything after 2008 is Obama's fault. That's false. Correct me. List Obama's debt since he's been elected, that adds up to 5 trillion. Let's see who's a shill.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts Last edited by Riot : 09-25-2012 at 03:28 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
" verified by virtually every single independent economist" Oh my !
__________________
We've Gone Delirious |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
http://economistsforromney.com/ |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sorry, I assume you read and remember the threads you have posted in? But go ahead and post economists talking about how the stimulus has failed - please. I'll be happy to post - again, for the third time - the ones that verify it was a success.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That is how you convert % into real numbers.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/...in-in-spending
"Nearly 100 prominent U.S. economists including former CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Ohio University’s Richard Vedder, and James C. Miller, III, who headed up the White House Office of Management and Budget under Ronald Reagan, are telling President Barack Obama that his economic stimulus has failed" There is 3, your turn.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I would just like the names of 2997 that refute their opinions.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Show one economist that says that data is wrong, and has his own data to disprove it (Hint - I know of two, that I've put on Derby Trail twice before, lets see if you can find them)
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |