Mitt Romney calls half of America freeloaders

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

For a supposedly smart guy, you sure are playing dumb here.

One more time, even slower. You said ALL of the lazy freeloaders are voting for Obama.

That is false. So do you want to keep talking around it, or are you just going to admit you're talking out of your ass?

I stand by my statement, what incentive does a lazy, freeloader have to vote for Romney? Are you going to admit that you were unaware of what the unemployment number means? It only counts people actively looking for work.

[Thepaindispenser]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ack-Obama.html

Romney was only a point behind so let's see what affect his comments have. I say nothing.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ack-Obama.html

Romney was only a point behind so let's see what affect his comments have. I say nothing.

And never has someone used so many words to do so.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by jms62

And never has someone used so many words to do so.

I don't care who you are or where you stand, that is funny.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

I don't care who you are or where you stand, that is funny.

It was a hanging curve that didn't break.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I stand by my statement, what incentive does a lazy, freeloader have to vote for Romney? Are you going to admit that you were unaware of what the unemployment number means? It only counts people actively looking for work.

I know what the number means. It's irrelevant to my point.

As if your whole act was embarrassing enough...now you're going to pretend that people on the right don't take advantage of the system also?

Like I said, much, much worse than Riot.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I know what the number means. It's irrelevant to my point.

As if your whole act was embarrassing enough...now you're going to pretend that people on the right don't take advantage of the system also?

Like I said, much, much worse than Riot.

If you knew what the number meant then why didn't you use it correctly?

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

If you knew what the number meant then why didn't you use it correctly?

It's pretty funny to watch you unable to answer the simplest of questions, while deflecting every chance you get.

Crawl back in your hole.

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

It's pretty funny to watch you unable to answer the simplest of questions, while deflecting every chance you get.

Crawl back in your hole.

I stand by my statement, the deflecting sounds like projecting on your part, please answer my simple question which is did you intentionally use the unempolyment rate incorrectly or did you not know who the unemployment rate represents?

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

I stand by my statement, the deflecting sounds like projecting on your part, please answer my simple question which is did you intentionally use the unempolyment rate incorrectly or did you not know who the unemployment rate represents?

You stand by your statement that ZERO people who will vote for Romney are freeloaders?

And people are supposed to have intelligent discourse with (one of) you? How is that possible when you're so brainwashed?

[Thepaindispenser]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

You stand by your statement that ZERO people who will vote for Romney are freeloaders?

And people are supposed to have intelligent discourse with (one of) you? How is that possible when you're so brainwashed?

Ok, I will clarify, a large majority of the freeloaders will vote for Obama. Since you are such a stickler for exact words, then please answer my question. Did you intentionally misuse the unemployment rate or did you not know who is represented in the unemployment rate?