Security guard shot at conservative group's DC office

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I don't think Riot is violent. Intolerant for sure but not violent.

But I can't help but notice how much the shooter looks like her.

I know you believe in The Loser's politics, but by taking the slippery slope that because a Liberal did this, then all liberals would do this is like my saying that all righties shoot up Shik Mosques...it just takes away any credibility one has, not that he has any to start with.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by GBBob

this is like my saying that all righties shoot up Shik Mosques...it just takes away any credibility one has, not that he has any to start with.

Riot would never generalize about the right.

Despite the fact she was creaming her pants after the Sikh shooting with hope it was a right wing conspiracy.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Riot would never generalize about the right.

Despite the fact she was creaming her pants after the Sikh shooting with hope it was a right wing conspiracy.

and you're just as bad, but can't see it.

[pointman]

Originally Posted by GBBob

I know you believe in The Loser's politics, but by taking the slippery slope that because a Liberal did this, then all liberals would do this is like my saying that all righties shoot up Shik Mosques...it just takes away any credibility one has, not that he has any to start with.

Come on Bob, what did he say that is not true? The far left has for a long time resorted to violence in order to impose their views and they refuse to debate with others. They have even through unions gotten laws passed and courts to condone such violence in certain instances. They are the same ones that knee-jerkedly, almost always incorrectly, accuse the right in every tragedy that occurs in this country.

It is no stretch to accuse them of what is the plain truth, that they are intolerant to the views of and have no respect for those that disagree with them.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by pointman

Come on Bob, what did he say that is not true? The far left has for a long time resorted to violence in order to impose their views and they refuse to debate with others. They have even through unions gotten laws passed and courts to condone such violence in certain instances. They are the same ones that knee-jerkedly, almost always incorrectly, accuse the right in every tragedy that occurs in this country.

It is no stretch to accuse them of what is the plain truth, that they are intolerant to the views of and have no respect for those that disagree with them.

Seriously?...As you said to me last week, I thought you were above this. As a bleeding heart Liberal as I am, I would NEVER start linking you with Olympic Park Bombings, Abortion Clinic Bombings or any other horrific crime cause by RIGHT WING extremest. Can't you agree there are bad and sick people on both sides of the table that give BOTH sides bad names without linking one to all?

[Thepaindispenser]

Bob, I will ask you again, did you denounce the liberals like Paul Krugman who immediately blamed the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, and others on the right after the Giffords shooting without any proof?

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Bob, I will ask you again, did you denounce the liberals like Paul Krugman who immediately blamed the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, and others on the right after the Giffords shooting without any proof?

When you start having objective conversations, I'll start denouncing people...please

[Thepaindispenser]

Nice try Bob, keep avoiding anything that contradicts your outdated, failed views. You aren't fooling anyone but Riot.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Nice try Bob, keep avoiding anything that contradicts your outdated, failed views. You aren't fooling anyone but Riot.

As a bleeding heart Liberal as I am, I would NEVER start linking you with Olympic Park Bombings, Abortion Clinic Bombings or any other horrific crime cause by RIGHT WING extremest. Can't you agree there are bad and sick people on both sides of the table that give BOTH sides bad names without linking one to all?

My saying that there are deranged sick people on both sides of a political party is an outdated, failed view? That's what I said...that neither party deserves 'guilt by association" in these cases. How much more clear can I be and how can you find fault with that?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Nice try Bob, keep avoiding anything that contradicts your outdated, failed views. You aren't fooling anyone but Riot.

"outdated views" Pretty funny for someone who believes in 1980's mantra of trickle down economics. In the 21st century the fact is that it is Trickle-Out economics as in trickle out of the country leaving less and less for us to purchase products to keep the economic engine running. I guess we will wait the 200 years or so for India and China to be buying our products rather then protecting their economies from our products as done now.