![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I looked at it sideways then because for what I wanted to spend, the P6 felt like an investment that had the far greater potential. And when I was 4 for 4 and 2x4 going into the last pair, I really thought it was going my way.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just by reading your analysis on the P5 -- I think you handicapped it well but your strategy was questionable based on what you wrote.
I could second guess your strategy by reading your own analysis this way. You took a stand and singled Hoorayforhollywood in the P6...but went 4 deep in the P5 using three others with him trying to get more "payoff potential" You went two deep in the opening leg despite calling it a "competitive race" -- and from a numbers standpoint -- it was a more competitive race like you said. Five of them in there looked very close and hard to separate on figures. And you didn't make a case for factors why one of the five was the right horse. In fact, your "most likely" hadn't raced in over 3 months and was plunging in for a tag for the first time in his life. Admittedly, he would have been my most likely as well -- but that race was crying for coverage. Where as 4-to-5 favorite HoorayforHollywood (your P6 single) had an edge in figures off his route race over the track last out and that was earned off of a layoff. Reading what you wrote, you could have easily singled HoorayforHollywood like you did in the P6 and not tried to split hairs in the 1st race. A P5 ticket of (5 X 4 X 1 X 3 X 1) costs just $30 and it pays you $484. That's an IRS hassle free 15-to-1 winner... despite practically buying that 1st leg and having odds on favorites win as your two singles. Of course, had you landed on the winner in the leg where you split hairs, and had that speed duel have cost Hoorayforhollywood the race, you'd have had a much nicer hit than a lousy stinking IRS free 15/1. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doug, what do u think the p5 pays if the 6, Great Warrior, catches HoorayforHollywood in the lane in r3. Any idea?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I thought Hoorayforhollywood ran his eye-balls out to win that breakaway speed duel and still hold on. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks Doug. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't have time for a post-script, but buying of races, like using 5 or maybe 6 in the 1st, is central to what I suggested regarding the 2 sequences going in and why I was more forcused on the P6. Narrow in the 3rd/5th and wider in the 1st/2nd/4th was obviously the preferable structure but making that call now with a $30 ticket is easy and nothing says the 2nd or 4th go your way with 'just' 4 & 3. What I didn't want to do or suggest was spending 'P6 money' trying to hit the P5.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984. Last edited by Kasept : 08-16-2012 at 06:44 AM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
But it was such an advantage situation -- even doing that wouldn't have been a bad idea as long as you structured it in a sane way and didn't baseball hopeless horses together on a "caveman" style ticket.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you were singling in the P5 in one or two slots, you would still need back ups? What do you think the ideal budget was for the 5?
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984. Last edited by Kasept : 08-16-2012 at 08:01 AM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've seen some p5's at Gulfstream where I doubted I could hit them going six deep the whole way. I didn't give my opinions here before the races for yesterdays card at Del Mar -- but by reading your analysis I think you handicapped the sequence pretty well. IMO, deciding how to play the p5 is like taking a survey. Each race has a question. For instance, Leg #1 is it was 'Two of the seven have almost no chance -- five others are very close. Can I do any actual handicapping and narrow it down if I have to? Leg #2 is 'none of the experienced horses in here have run near par for this class level. Do I trust all the workout reports and use the two firsters they like -- or do I spread?' And so on. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
do you usually set a max amount to bet, and if you can't find the right mix of plays...do you spend more, or do you just not do the bet?
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |