Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
You say lasix is a performance enhancer that should be banned because you allege it improves horses performances by lengths, whether the horse is a bleeder or not.
|
I said a few lengths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I'm a veterinarian that agrees with the 99.99% of veterinary medical and scientific professionals that lasix is a necessary and good therapeutic medication whose use must be continued for the health and welfare of the race horse, and should not be considered a "performance enhancer".
|
I don't really care who you are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I am listed on published scientific papers on the effect of lasix in race horses, and I have read the majority, if not all, of scientific information on the effect of lasix in race horses.
|
I don't care if you are listed on craigslist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
I've never read any studies that support your contention, that lasix is a strict performance enhancer. Only studies that contradict it.
|
Yes, I'm the first one to ever bring it up. Sure I am. I also never said it was only a performance enhancer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
So I'm really interested in your "facts", as your contention, unsupported by the veterinary medical community, is 100% of the argument against using this valuable therapeutic medication to help horses.
** The common way for "seasoned horse players" to bet horses is first or second use lasix. There's some interesting scientific data related to that. To bad horse players ignore science 
|
The medical community has no idea how to measure thoroughbred performance under race conditions, including you. Oh, and it is "too", not "to".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
But that doesn't have anything to do with the odd allegation that "lasix is a performance enhancer in all horses that moves horses up lengths".
I'll be interested to see your "proof". Can't wait.
|
I never said all horses. That would be silly.