Mitt Romney sold a drugged horse

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by OldDog

Still waiting for the rest of the testimony and evidence introduced, which may have something to do with why the Ebelings and Ann Romney were dismissed from the complaint, and why the vet didn't pay any damages. One person's testimony does not a slam dunk make.

you are wasting your time. If Riot reads something and forms an opinion based on what she believes that person is guilty. End of story. There is no gray area, no presentation of facts, and definitely no use of our constitutional legal system prior to passing judgement.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by wiphan

you are wasting your time. If Riot reads something and forms an opinion based on what she believes that person is guilty. End of story. There is no gray area, no presentation of facts, and definitely no use of our constitutional legal system prior to passing judgement.

wait, so a person not named in the suit, and a person removed from the suit, a suit ultimately settled without money being paid...is still a legit suit against those two? now, that is interesting.
i guess anyone ever charged or anyone who has a suit filed against them, is guilty regardless of the ultimate outcome. that's scary. good thing that isn't actually how things work here. hopefully it will always remain innocent til proven guilty, and not the other way around.

[Danzig]

check out this absurdity, on fast and furious:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/26/opinio...ntent=My+Yahoo


i am amazed that a reporter would write this. unreal.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

wait, so a person not named in the suit, and a person removed from the suit, a suit ultimately settled without money being paid...is still a legit suit against those two? now, that is interesting.
i guess anyone ever charged or anyone who has a suit filed against them, is guilty regardless of the ultimate outcome. that's scary. good thing that isn't actually how things work here. hopefully it will always remain innocent til proven guilty, and not the other way around.

LOL. Romneys pay off the filer of the lawsuit, try to have them sign confidentiality agreements (fail), and after the lawsuit moves through court for 18 months, panic and settle immediately before lawsuit goes to a judge in exchange for removing Romneys name from it ... and you think there was no money exchanged? And there was "no basis" for the suit?



Reality. Clearly not for everyone.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

you are wasting your time. If Riot reads something and forms an opinion based on what she believes that person is guilty. End of story. There is no gray area, no presentation of facts, and definitely no use of our constitutional legal system prior to passing judgement.

How's that information about the defense attorneys in Walker's John Doe information being found to be the ones spreading the leaks sitting with you?