Walker declares that if he loses his election, it will be due to massive and substantial one-sided voter fraud and Democratics cheating.
His allegation, of course, is completely disproven by ... well, facts.
But this is Scotty Walker. Facts don't matter.
Quote:
Per Dave Weigel, Slate
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/20...wisconsin.html
Quote:
Walker said: "I’ve always thought in this state, close elections, presidential elections, it means you probably have to win with at least 53 percent of the vote to account for fraud. One or two points, potentially."
That’s enough to change the outcome of the election. “Absolutely. I mean there’s no question why they went to court and fought [to undo] voter ID.”
|
There might be some question. The voter fraud issue was investigated in Wisconsin fairly recently, in the form of an Election Fraud Task Force and a deep dive into 2008's vote results.
The yearlong investigation charged 20 people -- this in an election with around 3 million ballots.
For fraud to equal "one or two points" in that election, you'd have needed 30,000-60,000 phony ballots.
The proven fraud actually amounted to 0.0007 percent of all votes.
The people who oppose voter ID laws say they're doing it to rescue the votes of poor or elderly people who lack current IDs. Sure, yes, this would probably be the cover story they'd use if they were trying to make life easier for criminals. But perhaps they're not! It's a possibility Walker rules out.
|