Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
I'd rather read War and Peace. I scanned through it and couldn't find it.
We all know these studies will usually find exactly what the people funding the study want it to find.
|
Well, no. Not at all. Properly done and peer-reviewed published studies are extremely valuable, as they stand up to scrutiny and questioning and dissection from "all sides".
Quote:
I prefer to use common sense. Horses raced for decades with this undetected microscopic bleeding.
|
That's right.
Quote:
They seemed to be just fine,
|
How can you speak to that in the least? It's a guess. I've watched horses race since the 1960's, too. How do you know they couldn't run a length faster? Or come back to their next race two weeks sooner?
Common sense - and physiology - tells me, as a veterinarian, that a horse with blood in it's alveoli can't oxygenate as well as one without microscopic blood in it's alveoli.
Quote:
and were a lot sturdier lot than what we have now.
|
That's an assumption stated as fact.
Quote:
I certainly don't think Lasix is the only problem, but shouldn't it have at least helped a little bit with horses being able to run more often?
|

It DOES help. ALOT. Measurably and repeatedly. There is plenty of proof over the past 40 years.
Quote:
Like I've said, as a bettor I don't really care if it is banned. I just have to laugh when those that say it isn't a performance enhancer dismiss that as ridiculous.
|
We'll, we're just going by the science.