![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It was a crack at Schrupp saying TVG bolstered Oaklawn's handle. If TVG was so helpful, how were they down so much on the 2nd biggest day of their meet?
Last edited by NTamm1215 : 03-20-2012 at 01:47 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I wasn't taking a shot at you. They (TVG) are touting the handle at OP up because its the only thing they have on that is worth something. Oaklawn lost 8 days last year due to weather and what's worse is that Santa Anita Saturday was sloppy and off turf. It would have been down even more if they were fast/firm.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() and with Keeneland and Woodbine opening today, Oaklawn has been bumped off the air.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Hot Springs, Ark., track reported total attendance of 592,431 and a daily average of 10,579. In 2011, attendance averaged 11,649 from a total 570,821. Wagering for the meet totaled $155,532,790 for a daily average of $2,777,371, compared with total and average handle of $151,623,944 and $3,094,366, respectively, in 2011.
Read more: http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...#ixzz1sV2yqR3t good news for oaklawn. average daily handle/attendance was down, but total handle/attendance was up. it pays not to miss days.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Oaklawn is a very poorly run racetrack for the simulcast bettor. Limited menu of wagering options, late draw for entries, poor post time management. At least HANA loves them... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
They spun it nicely by concentrating on the total number, which is not as important as the daily number. Basically, they ran 16% more days and received just over 2% more in handle. |