Quote:
Originally Posted by Clip-Clop
It is NatGeo, a magazine, online or not it is an article.
|
No. This is not the NatGeo magazine site. There is no article on the page I linked.
You have to find a topic regarding global warming and click on through to get to any scientific articles, of which there are many.
Quote:
"are expected", "could happen", "are likely", "may become" this many disclaimers in just one segment says it all. Inaccurate data referencing the weather data that has been collected throughout time and what a short period it is in the complete scale.
"He kicked off 100 years of climate research that has given us a sophisticated understanding of global warming."
Wow, really a whole 100 years!?
"According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eleven of the twelve hottest years since thermometer readings became available occurred between 1995 and 2006."
So with 'accuracy' dating all the way back to 1724 they were able to say that this data is useful in the scope of hundreds of thousands of years.
I read your article, you cannot dismiss the scientific method because the data you want suits the result you need.
|
Yeah. Which article specifically did you read?
Oh - and we scientists let the results tell us what to think. We don't make up our minds, then try to justify or dismiss it, as you are doing.
03-13-2012, 05:08 PM
Threaded Mode