![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The problem is that with a deep field and you have say three horses, let's say the favorite, a medium priced horse, and a long shot, covered, how best to cover the other nine in a twelve horse field?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() These that are already covered should be your top 3 in the race. So, place wp bets with #s 4,5,6. That leaves the bottom six out, but your covered for the top 6.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think it depends on the odds of the horses you do not have covered and the will pays on your live bets.
I sort of agree with what has already been said in that I would make win bets on the next 3 or 4 horses I think can win (depending on their odds) outside of the 3 I'm live to. I wouldn't hedge a double. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The last thing you want to do is hedge and lose both bets.
Each situation is totally different and needs to be approached in a different manner depending on expected payouts and odds of horses not covered in original bet. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Possibly using the horses you are alive to for second.....Other than that,hedging is usually a losing prop. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I also find this to be the case.
__________________
Favorite Trick--2yo HOY 1997 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() You have to be alive to a significantly large payout relative to the size of your wager, to hedge. Otherwise , as has been mentioned in this thread, it is a losing prop.
__________________
For 'tis the sport to have the engineer. Hoist with his own petard. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Definitely.
|