2/18-20 (SA): Santa Maria; San Vincente; Buena Vista (G2's)

[jms62]

Originally Posted by jms62

You needed to post twice?

Sham= 5 Starters
Lewis =8 Starters (Adequate)

And as far as my silly initial post, yeah I got carried away dismissing the Cali product based upon the Sh*it preps they have given us this year... My Bad. But what about you defending the product by going back to Giacamo? Beyond Silly. You produced that list pretty fast, you an insider out there? I have an idea for you make your weakness your strength... Give us the battle of the Ex's Derby Prep that way you only need to line up 2.

[RolloTomasi]

Originally Posted by jms62

And as far as my silly initial post, yeah I got carried away dismissing the Cali product based upon the Sh*it preps they have given us this year... My Bad.

Why don't you simply clarify what you mean instead of the jackass macho head games? A couple of the CA Derby preps were apparently Sh!t because they had small fields. I guess this means they were unbettable (never mind that Out Of Bounds paid out at 10-1 and Drill nearly 4-1).

However, they certainly were relevant and will continue to be so, because they will invariably feature top class prospects.

But what about you defending the product by going back to Giacamo? Beyond Silly.

Giacomo was what, 6 years ago? Talk about a fair weather fan. And, once again, I was not "defending the product". I was simply pointing out all the CA-based horses in the last decade (I know, I know, that's ancient history) that were, in fact, "relevant" on the Derby trail.

You produced that list pretty fast, you an insider out there?

I produced the list quickly because I follow horse racing. Do you?

[jms62]

Originally Posted by RolloTomasi

Why don't you simply clarify what you mean instead of the jackass macho head games? A couple of the CA Derby preps were apparently Sh!t because they had small fields. I guess this means they were unbettable (never mind that Out Of Bounds paid out at 10-1 and Drill nearly 4-1).

However, they certainly were relevant and will continue to be so, because they will invariably feature top class prospects.


Giacomo was what, 6 years ago? Talk about a fair weather fan. And, once again, I was not "defending the product". I was simply pointing out all the CA-based horses in the last decade (I know, I know, that's ancient history) that were, in fact, "relevant" on the Derby trail.


I produced the list quickly because I follow horse racing. Do you?

Sorry.. Unbettable Sh*t. Is that clear enough. For the last 7 years my most profitable segment is Derby Prep Super plays and if I can't get 8 horses in the gate the race is unplayable so that is my baseline.

As far as being a fan, I am a consumer of the markets put forward by tracks and what I've been getting from Santa Anita is not playable. And by the
way I post my plays on the selection thread for all to see.. I don't stay in the safety of the Paddock pontificating. And as of right now I fuking LOVE Baffert.

[RolloTomasi]

Originally Posted by jms62

As far as being a fan, I am a consumer of the markets put forward by tracks and what I've been getting from Santa Anita is not playable. And by the
way I post my plays on the selection thread for all to see.. I don't stay in the safety of the Paddock pontificating.

It's Cutler versus Powers all over again:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns6YSvCsVJM