![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
fixing congress has nothing to do with welfare. not sure how changing congressional rules-and perhaps having some REAL ethics rules, would cause harm to people receiving benefits.
at any rate, i hope people will at least vote against every incumbent who's had multiple terms in the next election. we have power, we need to use it. people seem to have forgotten they don't have to sit idly by and watch things happen.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fantastic news for Occupy goals, and the goals of those on this thread, from Montana today:
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Congress is no place for amateurs. I do agree with one thing: we have term limits now. It's called "voting". Taking away the one thing that citizens have to control their representatives: the threat to remove them from office - makes no sense. As seen in Illinois, term limits do nothing in itself to control corruption. We have an elected Congress that is mostly beholden to their corporate masters, not to the citizens. Term limits won't change that in the least. Removing the last and only method citizens control over their representatives? Getting money out of politics, reversing crazy decisions by activist conservative judges like Citizens' United, will. That's entirely what the Occupy movement is about. Making corporate ownership of our government a thing of the past, and returning our current plutocracy to a democracy.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |