H.J. Res. 90 The Occupied Amendment

[SOREHOOF]

Originally Posted by Riot

So you think that unlimited, unidentified corporate or private funds pouring into our elections is a good thing? That a corporation can contribute tons of money to purchase the election of any politician they want?

Gee.



I answered that last time you asked me

Sorry Riot. I guess i missed the Union answer, Getting old , I guess. I just don't see how a Union ( a group of people ) should be treated any different, in this respect, than a Corperation (a group of people ). I would always err on the side of Free Speech, if I was wrong. But I'm not. Love Ya!

[SOREHOOF]

We are being bullsh!t to the max by everybody. If the $$ being spent to procure power or to keep it, was spent on the social programs that we are being told we can't live without was actually spent on the social programs we wouldn't be talking about taxes in the !st place.

"At some point you have spent enough money". FTFH

You have been FLEECED by your GOV'T. Are you happy now?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

Sorry Riot. I guess i missed the Union answer, Getting old , I guess. I just don't see how a Union ( a group of people ) should be treated any different, in this respect, than a Corperation (a group of people ). I would always err on the side of Free Speech, if I was wrong. But I'm not. Love Ya!

Seems you jump to conclusions.

They shouldn't, IMO. Unions shouldn't be allowed to contribute to political funds, either.

And yes, I have been a member of a union.

[SOREHOOF]

I am pro-union in the Private sector,( but I love my Non-Union job, We are getting work from a local Union Co. that I used to work for. How does it get any better than that?), but anti-Union in the public sector. Some work environments need a Union, And from my experience they only work in their own favour, but some places do a whole lot better without them. I have never worked in a Govt job but I have friends that do.