Hey Riot

[Riot]

You two are hilarious. You both make exactly the same post (which, I guess, explains alot about "mindset" on the right):

Get angry-snarky and disparage the other person with a personal attack, then allege you are "better than that" while not being so, then say it's not important to you (while you've spent post after post in this thread talking about it), and finally, refusing to acknowlege that Prosser actually did exactly what he was accused of, what you have spent post after post denying he did.

And now you make excuses for his behaviour.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

You two are hilarious. You both make exactly the same post (which, I guess, explains alot about "mindset" on the right):

Get angry-snarky and disparage the other person with a personal attack, then allege you are "better than that" while not being so, then say it's not important to you (while you've spent post after post in this thread talking about it), and finally, refusing to acknowlege that Prosser actually did exactly what he was accused of, what you have spent post after post denying he did.

And now you make excuses for his behaviour.

did he touch her neck? yes

Did he choke her or put her in a choke hold? No

Did Bradley get up quickly and rush in the face of Prosser after he made a comment to The chief Justice? yes

Did it deserve all the media attention? No. Was this a non-issue and should it be a non issue? yes.

You keep making more out of nothing. Even Bradley realizes this, the rest of us can't figure out why you can't.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

did he touch her neck? yes

Did he choke her or put her in a choke hold? No

Did Bradley get up quickly and rush in the face of Prosser after he made a comment to The chief Justice? yes

Did it deserve all the media attention? No. Was this a non-issue and should it be a non issue? yes.

You keep making more out of nothing. Even Bradley realizes this, the rest of us can't figure out why you can't.

Yeah, keep spinning. For goodness sakes, don't bother to read all the documents involved with the case, either (it's clear you have not) - because they really negate your spin attempt

"Oh my God, I'm touching her neck!" - Justice David Prosser

"What does any self-respecting man do when suddenly that man finds that his hands, or part of his hands are on a woman's neck? Get them off the neck as soon as possible." - Justice David Prosser

What do you think about the part where Prosser said iin his disposition that late at night, he walks through the building, and the other judges clerk cries out in fear? What the hell is that craziness all about? What about the other clerks being afraid of his anger?

[Antitrust32]

Riot, were you in that room when everything went down?


no

so shut the fucl< up and stop judging everyone when you have no fucl<ing clue yourself.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Riot, were you in that room when everything went down?

no

so shut the fucl< up and stop judging everyone when you have no fucl<ing clue yourself.

LOL - You and Wiphan have just spent weeks judging me and attacking me for daring to think Prosser is the angry jack-wad he has repeatedly proved to be. The hypocrisy is amazing.

So don't start cursing me out because you found yourself wrong. If you can't do anything other than childish cursing personal attacks - which is pretty much all you do here - stop the hell posting in the politics thread.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - You and Wiphan have just spent weeks judging me and attacking me for daring to think Prosser is the angry jack-wad he has repeatedly proved to be. So don't start cursing me because you found yourself wrong.

oh now I'm wrong?

I was attacking you. not the situation. I never gave a **** about the situation. I find it hilarious that you care so much about something that doesnt even REMOTELY affect you, plus you were sooooooooooo sure he would either resign, or be forced out of his job.

Now that YOU were proven wrong and are spinning everything you can look at, it's just fun.

so shut the fucl< up.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

oh now I'm wrong?

I was attacking you. not the situation. I never gave a **** about the situation.

Exactly. Basically you are just a loser who only posts here to attack other people. Nice to see you admit you're just a troll.

so shut the fucl< up.

Don't cowtow to your threats. Get over yourself. You're not that important.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

LOL - You and Wiphan have just spent weeks judging me and attacking me for daring to think Prosser is the angry jack-wad he has repeatedly proved to be. The hypocrisy is amazing.

So don't start cursing me out because you found yourself wrong. If you can't do anything other than childish cursing personal attacks - which is pretty much all you do here - stop the hell posting in the politics thread.

Don't worry rumor has it Patrick Crooks (elected as a conservative turned liberal) is possibly retiring meaning that Bradley and Abrahamson would be on their own. Abrahamson (who I think is 78) would probably shortly retire as well since she is not real happy with not getting her way after many years of having the majority on her side (could possibly be 5-2 or 6-1 conservative majority)

[dellinger63]

Then

http://www.wpri.org/blog/?p=1525

and now

http://gazettextra.com/weblogs/lates...f-wood-jailed/


Three DUI's in 3 years and he was out forging scripts? Who were his judges?

Poster boy and failed savior of the recall Walker crowd.

[timmgirvan]

I think him calling her a bitch is one thing, but I dont condone physical abuse
in any situation! hope this clears things up!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

I think him calling her a bitch is one thing, but I dont condone physical abuse
in any situation! hope this clears things up!

What it clears up is that you haven't got a clue. You don't even realize that the incident with Prosser grabbing Justice Bradley's neck has nothing to do with the different time Prosser called Justice Abrahamson "a bitch" and threatened to "destroy" her.