![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Tampa Bay Downs is one of the best-run racetracks in America.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Then why are their purses so crappy?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The purses are crappy because they can get away with it. They've hollowed out a niche where lower level horses can get on the grass for 16K all winter instead of getting their heads handed to them @ GP or FG - same goes with the dirt - good luck filling 8K N3L's twice a day at GP.
It is convenient to Ocala and South FL so you've got stock all around that can ship in, and as a result the fields are huge... Finally, there is no incentive to increase the purses because there is NO COMPETITION from December to April - once the northern tracks open, trainers flee... by late April, there is usually less than a third of the stalls are full. I'd like to believe that takeout has something to do with their success as Doug alludes to - You've got basically the same product all summer long at Suffolk, yet not a fraction of the handle. Bettors can choose better horse racing at GP, FG, - with more formful/classier horses, higher profile trainers/connections, etc - yet Tampa continues to make a killing on a vastly inferior product, racing-wise - I don't know how the message to the industry can be anymore clear - It's the takeout, Stupid |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() And they make a killer Cuban sandwich.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Wouldnt an increase in handle automatically increase purses? I thought most tracks have the takeout split % wise between the horsemen(purses) and the track.
__________________
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lori, I don't know that the two are mutually inclusive - maybe Calzone can answer that..
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
it would depend on the amount of handle increase.
__________________
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The track is only 12 to 15 years removed from being River Downs.
How do their purses look when compared to River Downs and Suffolk? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Here's the chart of the 1997 Sam Davis:
![]() * Feature race on a Saturday * 12 horse field * $33,760 in the WPS pool * $15,360 in the exacta pool * $28,515 in the Tri pool * $7,455 in the Super pool (no one who played the super even had the first two numbers right!! It paid of on 7-ALL-ALL-ALL) Here's the chart of this years Sam Davis: http://www1.drf.com/drfNCWeeklyHorse...0212&raceNo=10 * Feature race on a Saturday * 10 horse field * $480,374 in win pool * $300,762 in exacta pool * $210,485 in trifecta pool * $116,765 in superfecta pool You had MSW races with purses of just $4,200 - that had $5,300 bet in the exacta pools. Sorry if you don't like where the purses are now .. but that place is growing better than any other racetrack bar none. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Tampa Bays purses arent higher because the TB HBPA is controlled by hacks from Suffolk who dont want purses to get too much higher because they know wont be able to compete and even more legit trainers will want to show up for better money. They have no objection to increases to the stakes purses because they are mostly won by ship-ins and with the handle increasing they have to use the money somewhere.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's also worth noting that part of what makes Tampa such a well run racetrack is how the staff manages the post times perfectly. That is an instant handle driver when done properly.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yes - if they did that with a 28% takeout - they might rack up an extra $78 in handle over the course of a card.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Their racing office absolutely sucks there, and as phystech said, all these gains they have had in wagering, and not a single purse increase. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
They raised purses in Feb 2001 by 6%. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's a matter of perspective. Horsemen may see problems with Tampa Bay Downs but it's great for bettors.
|