Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-2011, 12:06 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost View Post
Trickle down has been proven not to work. The problem, I freely admit, is to find a way to deal with the super rich, excessive salaries is a first step...yes, I think a million a year is plenty for anyone. As I said, if you create jobs, start a new business, or create meaningful innovation, there would be no limit to profits. This concept will never gain popularity in my lifetime, or the lifetimes of my kids and grandkids...maybe someday.
you say on one hand no limit to profits, while on the other talking about limiting salaries. you say trickle down doesn't work-so exactly what would be the point of limiting top salaries? all that money wouldn't go elsewhere, so i don't get why you're suggesting it!
like i said, the tax breaks should be to those with money who provide jobs to those who need them. not tax breaks for shelters to grow the wealth, which sits there-or pays for the likes of paris hilton. the rich are those with the means to provide jobs-the trick is to entice them to do so. cutting top salaries isn't how to do it-it's encouraging higher bottom salaries, and more of them. tax breaks for providing benefits, encouraging more employment-not making it more sensible to work the employees you have 80 hours a week to avoid paying ss, workmens comp, and other costs of hiring. it shouldnt be cheaper to pay overtime rather than to hire more, but it is. besides, i'd imagine those top salaries include stock options-start giving some of those to your employees-paying a bit more to those you have makes them happier, and more productive. congress needs to rethink job creation, and taxes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-2011, 12:47 PM
somerfrost's Avatar
somerfrost somerfrost is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Posts: 4,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
you say on one hand no limit to profits, while on the other talking about limiting salaries. you say trickle down doesn't work-so exactly what would be the point of limiting top salaries? all that money wouldn't go elsewhere, so i don't get why you're suggesting it!
like i said, the tax breaks should be to those with money who provide jobs to those who need them. not tax breaks for shelters to grow the wealth, which sits there-or pays for the likes of paris hilton. the rich are those with the means to provide jobs-the trick is to entice them to do so. cutting top salaries isn't how to do it-it's encouraging higher bottom salaries, and more of them. tax breaks for providing benefits, encouraging more employment-not making it more sensible to work the employees you have 80 hours a week to avoid paying ss, workmens comp, and other costs of hiring. it shouldnt be cheaper to pay overtime rather than to hire more, but it is. besides, i'd imagine those top salaries include stock options-start giving some of those to your employees-paying a bit more to those you have makes them happier, and more productive. congress needs to rethink job creation, and taxes.
I agree! Limiting top salaries is just the first step, the trick is having those savings go toward a more equatable salary structure (I mentioned increases in salaries for those involved in direct care for example). I'm not smart enough to figure out the best way to do that but merely limiting top salaries is not the total answer. Somehow, we must entice the super rich to "spread the wealth" and I have no idea how we do that unless we tax all income over a set figure at 100% which has drawbacks as well. In a capitalistic society limiting wealth effects job creation, innovation and risk taking...we don't want to do that, at the same time we want to reduce the ever growing gap between the rich and the rest of society....I see a sane salary structure as but the first step.
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2011, 06:31 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somerfrost View Post
I agree! Limiting top salaries is just the first step, the trick is having those savings go toward a more equatable salary structure (I mentioned increases in salaries for those involved in direct care for example). I'm not smart enough to figure out the best way to do that but merely limiting top salaries is not the total answer. Somehow, we must entice the super rich to "spread the wealth" and I have no idea how we do that unless we tax all income over a set figure at 100% which has drawbacks as well. In a capitalistic society limiting wealth effects job creation, innovation and risk taking...we don't want to do that, at the same time we want to reduce the ever growing gap between the rich and the rest of society....I see a sane salary structure as but the first step.
"Spread the wealth" is un-American. Make something of yourself and stop whining about what others make. The Govt doesn't belong in the "fairness" business because it most certainly isn't fair.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2011, 07:56 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You tell 'em, Chuck.

Survival of the fittest.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2011, 07:08 AM
3kings's Avatar
3kings 3kings is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
"Spread the wealth" is un-American. Make something of yourself and stop whining about what others make. The Govt doesn't belong in the "fairness" business because it most certainly isn't fair.


Post of the Year and words to live by.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-12-2011, 09:17 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

to make things equal, some want to tear the top down. that would be infinitely easier than finding ways to bring the bottom up. don't encourage achievement, penalize it. hard work, ingenuity...discourage it. yeah, that's the way to fix everything.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-12-2011, 02:25 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
to make things equal, some want to tear the top down. that would be infinitely easier than finding ways to bring the bottom up. don't encourage achievement, penalize it. hard work, ingenuity...discourage it. yeah, that's the way to fix everything.

LOL..Who said anything about equal? We are struggling to keep 3 classes..Keep voting for Conservatives, and you (and 99% of Arkansas) will be in the lesser of 2 classes. If hard work was always rewarded in this society, there'd be more of it going on. When people work hard, and aren't rewarded? That's when the problems come. Matter of fact, the best way to turn this economy around would be if hard work was always rewarded. That's not going to happen. Rich people's real wages keep going up, and everyone else's real wages are stagnant, or going down. That is a recipe for a 2 class system.

Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 06-12-2011 at 02:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2011, 03:09 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,799
Default

Reward those hard working CEO's for shipping jobs to China and India. And then stand around with our thumbs up our ass wondering why there is no recovery, why are cars,houses,etc not selling. Keep listening to the economists using thier 19th century text books to analyze a 21 st century paradigm. What is Germany doing right?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-12-2011, 05:33 PM
Rileyoriley's Avatar
Rileyoriley Rileyoriley is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Snowy Woods
Posts: 4,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3kings View Post

Post of the Year and words to live by.
Ditto
__________________
Hillary Clinton 2016: The "Extremely Careless" Leadership America Needs!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-12-2011, 11:15 PM
DaTruth's Avatar
DaTruth DaTruth is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,969
Default

I think we need to punish Standard Oil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIMi7fBA6e4
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-13-2011, 09:03 AM
geeker2's Avatar
geeker2 geeker2 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaTruth View Post
I think we need to punish Standard Oil.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIMi7fBA6e4
Huey !!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N2CANatVYQ
__________________
We've Gone Delirious
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.