NHL Playoffs

[MaTH716]

Originally Posted by slotdirt

Good point, there are only four games left in the finals. Appropriate punishment, IMO.

I think that should be the rule for the regular season too. It's an eye for an eye type deal.
If someone should deliver a blatent cheap shot (regardless of blind side hit, slash, high stick, etc....). The offender should sit out for as long as the injured party is out plus whatever suspension is handed out.

Obviously we are talking about match penalty type hits (which really don't occur too many times a season).

[ateamstupid]

That was a ridiculous and unnecessary hit and it looks like it woke the Bruins up.

[docicu3]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

I think that should be the rule for the regular season too. Is an eye for an eye type deal.
If someone should deliver a blatent cheap shot (regardless of blind side hit, slash, high stick, etc....). The offender should sit out for as long as the injured party is out plus whatever suspension is handed out.

Obviously we are talking about match penalty type hits (which really don't occur too many times a season).

It's not an equal sanction at all....the Bruins lose a first line forward who is far more valuable than this goon who is replaceable by any defenseman Vancouver
has.

They should take a roster spot from Vancouver so they dress one less guy to make it close to fair.....

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by docicu3

It's not an equal sanction at all....the Bruins lose a first line forward who is far more valuable than this goon who is replaceable by any defenseman Vancouver
has.

They should take a roster spot from Vancouver so they dress one less guy to make it close to fair.....

Or....take out Burrows or a Sedin

[slotdirt]

Both Sedins and Kesler were targeted in some form or fashion last night after the Horton hit. I wouldn't say Rome has had a reputation as a "goon" in the same way Matt Cooke has, but he's earned his fair share of game misconducts in the past, so a lengthier suspension was probably not out of the question.

[pgiaco]

I think keeping him out the remainder of the final is an appropriate suspension. It is hard to suspend someone for the duration of another player's injury because what do you do if he comes back and then goes out again with recurrent symptoms?
That being said, players need to respect each other. While you are always taught to keep your head up, especially in high traffic areas, nobody expects to get hit 3 seconds after you get rid of the puck. I'm not sure what Mike Murphy was thinking when he said Rome was suspended for the lateness of the hit, that it would have been legal if delivered earlier. If that's a legal hit, the why have Rule 48 (head shot rule) on the books at all.. Finally, Rome has to understand that now his team's top players will now be targets. Just a stupid play all around.

[MaTH716]

Originally Posted by pgiaco

I think keeping him out the remainder of the final is an appropriate suspension. It is hard to suspend someone for the duration of another player's injury because what do you do if he comes back and then goes out again with recurrent symptoms?
That being said, players need to respect each other. While you are always taught to keep your head up, especially in high traffic areas, nobody expects to get hit 3 seconds after you get rid of the puck. I'm not sure what Mike Murphy was thinking when he said Rome was suspended for the lateness of the hit, that it would have been legal if delivered earlier. If that's a legal hit, the why have Rule 48 (head shot rule) on the books at all.. Finally, Rome has to understand that now his team's top players will now be targets. Just a stupid play all around.

In this case the 4 games worked out well because it guarantees that Rome is done for the series. I really believe that if Horton wasn't hurt, then Rome would have only gotten 2 games. In this day and age, I'm not sure how many guys are able to rush back from head injuries.

Rome looked like he left his feet, so that is definitely not a legal hit in any way.

Not sure about the watching their back thing. The ultimate payback for the B's would be taking home the Cup. They can't get wrapped up in payback and take stupid penalties in the process. The other night was a perfect opportunity for a little redemption with the game out of hand. But going forward their sole focus should be on the Cup and the rest will eventually take care of itself.

[slotdirt]

That's absolutely a legal hit if Horton still has the puck, IMO. Even legal if Horton was in the process of dishing the puck. Definitely not legal three seconds after the puck leaves his possession. Then again, he's probably not in such a prone position if he did have the puck in his possession, so part of the injury surely had something to do with the lateness of the hit.

Seriously though, big hits are a part of hockey, and should be, but absolutely not when a guy is far removed from the play. A timing hit like that is typically legal, but also very difficult to pull off for a defender. Like I said the other day, Rome should ask a big, legal hitter like Nik Kronwall how one is supposed to make an explosive check whilst a man still has the puck. Here are a couple good examples of how a similar play can be legal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfX5BwDKjq0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf-HK776GHA&feature=fvst

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL94Y...eature=related