![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My hope for Obamacare is that he fails to get re-elected in 2012. A Republican becomes President and they also control both the Senate and House. This way this crappy bill that was shoved on the American public by Obama, Reid, and Pelosi gets repealed. None of those three imbeciles will be using using this health care. Glad me and my family won't have to use it either.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You're a rocket scientist.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Did I say that c? Keep on saying something that didn't say. As Duvalier said STFU. I have nothing against people paying for health care. I don't want people to get a free ride. Go back to your make believe world.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It's the non-paying deadbeats that are causing health care costs to skyrocket in the first place. That's why a 68 cent aspirin costs $10 in the hospital. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Riot made me laugh saying "Now people can pay for insurance." Oh yeah? You mean the subsidized cost. It always costs the taxpayers more and more, and to give the needy more means to give the productive less. I wonder how many people who support ObamaCare would be charged up about it if we added one minor change: If you've EVER bought a pack of cigarettes (which will now be tracked with your ID) you are exempted from treatment for the following conditions: lung cancer, emphysema, heart disease, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and whatever other smoking related illnesses where a valid causal or statistical link can be verified. That would certainly keep costs way down. Because, like it or not, it's not the Wall Street Bankers and stock brokers buying the majority of those cigarettes. Go to a casino and look at who's doing the majority of the smoking, with the costs of their treatment to be passed on to you at a later date. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Most will be self-pay and purchase their own insurance without any subsidy, due to new availability for purchase on exchanges. Most of those people are only not currently insured because insurance companies don't want to bother to insure them. Not because they are on Medicaid, or are poor, or don't have the money to buy a normal amount of insurance. And what do you think about the millions in Medicare waste that are eliminated by the PPACA? The PPACA is not "socialized medicine", nor is it huge new taxpayers subsidies. It is insurance reform of the private insurance industry. You make me laugh when you repeat talking points, that the facts don't support. Why don't you go look up the costs of the PPACA? And where the funding comes from? Tell me the increase in costs to taxpayers? It's clearly outlined, and the CBO has addressed it in detail. So those figures on the costs of the PPACA are very easy to obtain. Because you are clearly seriously uninformed about "what the taxpayers are paying for" with it. There is no increase in taxpayer payment. Period. It's nice to keep repeating an argument about concern for taxpayers, but not when it's false. The PPACA is no giant givaway of health care to "needy". These blatent falsehoods about the PPACA keep being perpetuated, and it has to stop.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts Last edited by Riot : 05-11-2011 at 03:54 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yes, the attacks on Michelle Obama for trying to get kids to eat right and exercise are beyond absurd and silly. It would be like attacking Lady Bird Johnson for environmental issues, or Nancy Reagan for trying to eliminate drug abuse.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's a good thing. A very good thing, especially from your worry about taxpayers being soaked. Why are you against the taxpayer's being less "soaked"? That makes no sense. Quote:
That's precisely what the PPACA tries to address. You'll note it also has provisions in it to help decrease prescription costs. So your opposition to it makes little sense to me - it seems to address all your primary concerns.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts Last edited by Riot : 05-11-2011 at 02:04 PM. |