![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Jockey Club "Handicapper" W. S. Vosburgh on the subject with one of his typical brutally long winded columns from the late 1910's.
This was in a period of no speed figures - No Beyers, no Ragozin Sheets etc. Obviously - figures are king in discussions on subjects like these. ![]() ![]() ![]() Later on - the subject of old jockeys naming the best they've ever seen... ![]() It's cuts off talking about Hindoo and Luke Blackburn. Basically, both were in the same stable and ridden by the same jockey. When asked to name the better horse - the trainer favored Hindoo. While the jockeys reply was always "Luke Blackburn, of course" |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This is Vosburgh's opinion of the best 2yo - and best 3yo - each year - from 1866-to-1915.
Not only did he compile this list - but he also did a write-up profiling each horse. He also rated the crops every single year. Best 2yo's: ![]() ![]() Best 3yo's: ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The columnist Salvator labeled Man O' War "a speed marvel" - compared him to 1870's star Ten Broeck - claimed he never proved himself as a race horse - and called his match race against Sir Barton "a circus act" claiming everyone knew Sir Barton was off form battling physical issues.
Interestingly though - he was a very strong defender of Man O' War as a stallion. Writing entire columns mocking those claiming he was "an overrated sire" later into his stallion career. Here's all I could find of Vosburgh's takes on Man O' War: Speaking on his crop at age 2: ![]() After his Belmont Stakes win: ![]() Speaking high praise of him a few years after his last race in a column profiling past Belmont winners: ![]() Other than Man O' War's Belmont - I could not find a sensationally fast race of his. His Preakness was not fast. His Travers was not fast at all. |