Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2011, 10:49 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig View Post
and who's going to suggest that simple fix?! the leading dems are all in denial about the need for a fix.
Harry Reid has already suggested that this senate. The Dems have always embraced that.

The "denial" is what you posted about the stability of the system for the next 27 years; the Dems accurately point out that SS does not need an "immediate emergency fix with reduction of benefits" as the Republicans would like to do, are maintaining must be done, right now.

Quote:
as for 'raising the cap'....how can you require people to put into social security, ostensibly for them to regain at retirement, and then tell them they can't have it after all?
What are you talking about? Nobody would do that. Who would be told they can't have it? I don't know what you are speaking of? Believe me, with the ages people are living to now, everyone would still get out more than they put in, as now. The cash flow would be outstandingly better.

Quote:
it's no longer a retirement fund when you do that-it's a tax.
A tax? No. It's exactly what we have now. Exactly. A percentage of income up to a dollar amount of gross income. The cap is simply raising that dollar amount from $103,800 to $200,000.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-07-2011, 07:27 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Harry Reid has already suggested that this senate. The Dems have always embraced that.

The "denial" is what you posted about the stability of the system for the next 27 years; the Dems accurately point out that SS does not need an "immediate emergency fix with reduction of benefits" as the Republicans would like to do, are maintaining must be done, right now.



What are you talking about? Nobody would do that. Who would be told they can't have it? I don't know what you are speaking of? Believe me, with the ages people are living to now, everyone would still get out more than they put in, as now. The cash flow would be outstandingly better.



A tax? No. It's exactly what we have now. Exactly. A percentage of income up to a dollar amount of gross income. The cap is simply raising that dollar amount from $103,800 to $200,000.

er, the denial was in the link above, where leading dems said that ss has no effect on the deficit, which is untrue. they seem to have no idea what state ss is in, which probably explains the cut to withholding. yeah, let's lower taxes..then we can raise them to pay the interest to get ss back where it needs to be. makes perfect sense. and yes, it is a tax. let's not kid ourselves on that. changing retirement ages, cutting benefits, etc. many do not get back what they put in.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.