Egypt

[Nascar1966]

Originally Posted by Danzig

now, is that a more palatable post? i've said to riot that i thought she wasn't evenhanded, that she often seems to be cheerleading one party while critical of the other. you're the same way! funny that you accuse her of doing that, and you do the same-only for the other side. in other words, pot meet kettle! but, like i've read and thought was spot on, and said on here before: how great the sin when someone else commits it. now, tell me how you're able to discuss each issue, rather than always take one party's side. now, don't really try, as that's a rhetorical question.

When did I post that sherlock?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Nascar1966

When did I post that sherlock?

you didn't. i took what you wrote about riot, and changed the appropriate names to you and your party. now, do you understand? you calling out someone for talking good only about one side, and only attacking one side is downright hilarious-as well as hypocritical. you do that every day! every post. you attack everything done by obama and the dems as being a bad thing, and everything done by the reps as a good thing. it's not! just like your attempt to bash obama over pell grants. not one person has agreed with you thus far. your attempt at attacking him in that respect failed miserably, as his points are well made.

[Nascar1966]

Originally Posted by Danzig

you didn't. i took what you wrote about riot, and changed the appropriate names to you and your party. now, do you understand? you calling out someone for talking good only about one side, and only attacking one side is downright hilarious-as well as hypocritical. you do that every day! every post. you attack everything done by obama and the dems as being a bad thing, and everything done by the reps as a good thing. it's not! just like your attempt to bash obama over pell grants. not one person has agreed with you thus far. your attempt at attacking him in that respect failed miserably, as his points are well made.

Just curious about it. People are entitled to thier opinions. The Pell Grant thread I was trying to gauge other people's view on it. Whether in agreement or disagreement. You don't feel that Riot is always attacking the Republican Party?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Nascar1966

Just curious about it. People are entitled to thier opinions. The Pell Grant thread I was trying to gauge other people's view on it. Whether in agreement or disagreement. You don't feel that Riot is always attacking the Republican Party?

does it matter? sometimes i agree with her, sometimes i don't. sometimes i think she gives dems far too much credit. sometimes i think reps not enough.
but, ask yourself that same question. are you always attacking dems? if so, why? surely you don't think one party has all the answers, and the other none? if you don't think she's right, how can you be right by always opposing? think about it. some dems sometimes vote with reps, and vice versa. that should tell you that you can't just lump them all together.


btw, sometimes they need attacking. same for the dems. they come up with some pretty sorry, stupid crap. for gods sakes, the reps had sarah palin as their vp nominee. can't get much dumber than that.

[Nascar1966]

Originally Posted by Danzig

does it matter? sometimes i agree with her, sometimes i don't. sometimes i think she gives dems far too much credit. sometimes i think reps not enough.
but, ask yourself that same question. are you always attacking dems? if so, why? surely you don't think one party has all the answers, and the other none? if you don't think she's right, how can you be right by always opposing? think about it. some dems sometimes vote with reps, and vice versa. that should tell you that you can't just lump them all together.

Very true what you just said. My opinion is that Riot feels that the Dems can do no wrong. Riot brought about the person who resigned over some pics and was a Republican. Yet no mention is made of Charlie Rangel who comitted a far more serious offense and is still serving.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Nascar1966

Very true what you just said. My opinion is that Riot feels that the Dems can do no wrong. Riot brought about the person who resigned over some pics and was a Republican. Yet no mention is made of Charlie Rangel who comitted a far more serious offense and is still serving.

Strange you completely ignore my answer to you, in favor of what you'd prefer to think in spite of what I say.

[Nascar1966]

Originally Posted by Riot

Strange you completely ignore my answer to you, in favor of what you'd prefer to think in spite of what I say.

Ever watch the movie A Few Good Men? You play the Colonel. Remember what Tom Cruise told the Colonel? Did you not bring up the man who resigned over the pics of bad taste?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Nascar1966

Very true what you just said. My opinion is that Riot feels that the Dems can do no wrong. Riot brought about the person who resigned over some pics and was a Republican. Yet no mention is made of Charlie Rangel who comitted a far more serious offense and is still serving.

i'd imagine the rep resigned because of pressure from his constituents, which probably can't be said about ol charlie. and as long as those pols self-police, they won't be knocking each other out over ethics. the one who votes rangel out might be the next on the chopping block.