The new party of no?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

And you are unable to understand the difference?

only if she is proposing seniors making 250K or more are NOT going to get the checks. Otherwise she's trying to pimp some senior votes.

Or do you think seniors making 250K or more or even poor seniors should get checks and have the youngsters in grades 1-5 pay for them in 20 yrs w/interest?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

only if she is proposing seniors making 250K or more are NOT going to get the checks. Otherwise she's trying to pimp some senior votes.

Or do you think seniors making 250K or more or even poor seniors should get checks and have the youngsters in grades 1-5 pay for them in 20 yrs w/interest?

Wow. If she were trying to "pimp some senior votes", you'd think they would have done this, you know, before the election, when it would have resulted in some votes It's been discussed for a year.

Nobody has intertwined our income tax structure with social security COLA, as you are doing above. Interesting.

Social security is fine for the next 40 years, even if we do nothing, isn't it?

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Riot

Wow. If she were trying to "pimp some senior votes", you'd think they would have done this, you know, before the election, when it would have resulted in some votes It's been discussed for a year.

Nobody has intertwined our income tax structure with social security COLA, as you are doing above. Interesting.

Social security is fine for the next 40 years, even if we do nothing, isn't it?

40 years is a very very very short amount of time.

It is fine for the old people and baby boomers, and that is really it.