Repubtards still don't get it

ateamstupid · #1 11-03-2010, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

gridlock is what this country was founded on. it would be stupid if everything had a free pass through anything. the founding fathers created this system to create gridlock.

progressives dont like gridlock because they want an unlimited credit card.

It's pretty funny how you always read things the way you want to read them. No one's talking about free passes. You made that up.

Democrats lost independents and democrats because they feel nothing got accomplished the first two years. This is my point. There's no republican plan for anything. It's essentially 'let's make rich people richer again and stop healthcare.' And the ever ambiguous 'cutting spending.' Often by recommending tax cuts. Which still makes no sense. That's not going to win them anything in 2012, sorry.

Antitrust32 · #2 11-03-2010, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

It's pretty funny how you always read things the way you want to read them.

Democrats lost independents and democrats because they feel nothing got accomplished the first two years. This is my point. There's no republican plan for anything. It's 'let's make rich people richer again and stop healthcare.' And the ever ambiguous 'cutting spending'. Often by recommending tax cuts. Which still makes no sense. That's not going to win them anything in 2012, sorry.

pot meet kettle

ateamstupid · #3 11-03-2010, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

pot meet kettle

Sure.

Antitrust32 · #4 11-03-2010, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

It's pretty funny how you always read things the way you want to read them. No one's talking about free passes. You made that up.

Democrats lost independents and democrats because they feel nothing got accomplished the first two years. This is my point. There's no republican plan for anything. It's essentially 'let's make rich people richer again and stop healthcare.' And the ever ambiguous 'cutting spending.' Often by recommending tax cuts. Which still makes no sense. That's not going to win them anything in 2012, sorry.

pretty sure jobs and lowering the deficit are the two main things on republicans minds...

but you can read things the way you want to read them of course. i dont agree with anything in your second paragraph. its the liberal equivalent of birther and obama is a muslim speak.

ateamstupid · #5 11-03-2010, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

pretty sure jobs and lowering the deficit are the two main things on republicans minds...

but you can read things the way you want to read them of course. i dont agree with anything in your second paragraph. its the liberal equivalent of birther and obama is a muslim speak.

You're so bad at equivalents it's crazy.

What's the republican plan for creating jobs and lowering the deficit? What are they going to do that Obama hasn't done? I'd really like to know.

Antitrust32 · #6 11-03-2010, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

You're so bad at equivalents it's crazy.

What's the republican plan for creating jobs and lowering the deficit? What are they going to do that Obama hasn't done? I'd really like to know.

no, you threw out MSNBC speak that is equally as ridiculous as Fox News speak.

Ahh the republicans hate the middle class! ahh they only care about the rich.

its ridiculous.

ateamstupid · #7 11-03-2010, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

no, you threw out MSNBC speak that is equally as ridiculous as Fox News speak.

Ahh the republicans hate the middle class! ahh they only care about the rich.

its ridiculous.

The Bush tax cuts that they want to renew didn't benefit rich people disproportionately?

I'm still waiting to hear the Republican economic plan. You must know it.

Antitrust32 · #8 11-03-2010, 10:02 AM

"The Boehner plan would bring federal spending back to 2008 levels, excluding national-security expenditures and programs for seniors and veterans, such as Social Security. That means some big one-year cuts (about $100 billion worth, according to House Republicans) in an Obama budget proposal that totals $3.8 trillion in spending for 2011.

Potential cuts, according to ideas put forward this year by Republicans within the House Budget Committee, could include canceling stimulus projects for which money hasn't yet been committed, freezing federal salaries temporarily, or hiring only one federal worker for every two who retire."

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...s-Can-it-work/

also you do realize that the rich are the same people who employ us middle class folks? if the govnt takes more of their money to waste it, will those rich people hire more workers?

or do you want all the new jobs to be government jobs?

Antitrust32 · #9 11-03-2010, 10:06 AM

and you know a lot of republicans are for cutting spending across the board. including military.

It is also important to look out for the future, not just the present. We cant keep borrowing and spending like we are and expect everything to be okay. We shouldnt spend more than we bring in.

Bush started this massive spending spree and Obama is taking it over and increasing it. They are both terrible presidents.

Newt should be the guy for 2012.. and Hillary is the Dems hope. She's actually knowledgable and experienced.

ateamstupid · #10 11-03-2010, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

"The Boehner plan would bring federal spending back to 2008 levels, excluding national-security expenditures and programs for seniors and veterans, such as Social Security. That means some big one-year cuts (about $100 billion worth, according to House Republicans) in an Obama budget proposal that totals $3.8 trillion in spending for 2011.

Potential cuts, according to ideas put forward this year by Republicans within the House Budget Committee, could include canceling stimulus projects for which money hasn't yet been committed, freezing federal salaries temporarily, or hiring only one federal worker for every two who retire."

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...s-Can-it-work/

also you do realize that the rich are the same people who employ us middle class folks? if the govnt takes more of their money to waste it, will those rich people hire more workers?

or do you want all the new jobs to be government jobs?

It's been proven over and over that rich people generally hoard money and export jobs no matter what, they don't put the extra money back into the system, but that's another debate.

That plan doesn't tell me how they're going to create jobs. It says they're going to trim 2% of the budget (according to them) and bring spending levels back to 2008 (even though Republicans constantly assert that Bush spent way too heavily too) except for a bunch of other stuff.

It's just red meat for people who hate Obama. That's not a plan for fixing the economy.

clyde · #11 11-03-2010, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

You're so bad at equivalents it's crazy.

What's the republican plan for creating jobs and lowering the deficit? What are they going to do that Obama hasn't done? I'd really like to know.

I think not doing what he has done will be a very good thing.

Bandy aids on compound fractures just ain't woikin'.

SOREHOOF · #12 11-04-2010, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

You're so bad at equivalents it's crazy.

What's the republican plan for creating jobs and lowering the deficit? What are they going to do that Obama hasn't done? I'd really like to know.

This has been out a while. This is one of them.
http://www.roadmap.republicans.budget.house.gov/

hoovesupsideyourhead · #13 11-03-2010, 09:52 AM

as soon as you earn over 48k a year you will understand..

Honu · #14 11-03-2010, 07:32 PM

Hearing Obama speak about the great communicators Reagan and Clinton as he was saying "uh uh uh" makes me think he missed that day in speech class.
Bullshyte aside it is a fact that this country had a bigger surplus of revenue when there was a Democrat(Clinton) as president and the Republicans were in charge of Congress. Perhaps the current president should take look back at that and see how it the elected officials made it work.

clyde · #15 11-03-2010, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honu

Hearing Obama speak about the great communicators Reagan and Clinton as he was saying "uh uh uh" makes me think he missed that day in speech class.
Bullshyte aside it is a fact that this country had a bigger surplus of revenue when there was a Democrat(Clinton) as president and the Republicans were in charge of Congress. Perhaps the current president should take look back at that and see how it the elected officials made it work.

From you..I can accept this.

It goes pretty deeper and deeper,but you're all right.

You could challenge Debbie,Franny and Gooey.....if,if,if.

clyde · #16 11-03-2010, 08:53 PM

I meant what you said goes a lot deeper...not the other thing.

ArlJim78 · #17 11-03-2010, 11:06 PM

come on man, at least buy a clue before spouting off. this stuff is below Matt Damon level.

Antitrust32 · #18 11-03-2010, 09:53 AM

democrats lost independants because independants didnt like the direction the dems were taking us on. not that they didnt accomplish enough. they dont even agree with what was accomplished.

dems might have lost other dems because they didnt accomplish enough. but do you really believe a that kind of Dem would vote for a republican? if anything it just made them stay home and not vote.