![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
unless you're Randall and don't have to worry about that. He's always happy.Tossing Boys at Tosconova and Jaycito in favor of Stay Thirsty is lunacy. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thats about the same opinion as everyone else. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
OK, Copernicus, there's a reason for that.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I appreciate this, finally the respect I deserve.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Haha.... I think Mo has an excellent chance, but you're love of Stay Thirsty and your disdain for Boys of Tosconova has nothing to do with the distance, pace scenerio or any other legitimate race dynamics of the BC Juvy, which is my problem with your opinion.
It's all based on you being a "superfan" of Stay Thirsty and thinking he's going to develop into a superhorse. And, that you wanted to beat BOT in the Hopeful, and lost. So now you want to try to beat him again, and get your money back. That's not a smart way to handicap and bet in my opinion, but good luck. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think UM is far and away the most likely winner. B@T had a dream trip last out, it has nothing to do with my love for Stay Thirsty. I feel he ran good enough, and yes I do think he should improve. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is he going to go to the front, get the lead and stay? Doubtful with JP's Gusto and his own stablemate in the field. Is he going to rate and finish? He had dead aim in his debut and didn't pass the eventual winner. Wishcasting that he is suddenly going to be able to rate is a horrible idea. The respective trips of Stay Thirsty and Boys at Tosconova in the Hopeful are not enough to bridge the gap between the two. Boys at Tosconova is a much better horse right now and I don't see how you could use Stay Thirsty over him. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like I said, I disagree with you in this specific case, but I love what you're saying. You may be turning a corner.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
He'll turn the other three within the hour.
|