Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2010, 01:32 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

baseball and football are apples and oranges. The role of a manager in baseball and a head football coach are completely different and the two really shouldn't be compared.

If the comparison is in the sense of having a team consistently winning but not winning the title, then comparing to Marv Levy isn't really fair either. Bobby Cox won Manager of the year at least once in the 80's, 90's and 2000's. His teams won 14 straight division titles. Levy's bills were good for about 7 years and really good for 4 and Levy Never won a super bowl...although that doesn't impact my opinion that he was a good coach.

Cox was lifetime 500 games over.500. He is the fourth winningest manager in baseball history.

Over the last forty years, who was better? And if someone was better, what makes that manager better? More world series?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2010, 01:44 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
baseball and football are apples and oranges. The role of a manager in baseball and a head football coach are completely different and the two really shouldn't be compared.

If the comparison is in the sense of having a team consistently winning but not winning the title, then comparing to Marv Levy isn't really fair either. Bobby Cox won Manager of the year at least once in the 80's, 90's and 2000's. His teams won 14 straight division titles. Levy's bills were good for about 7 years and really good for 4 and Levy Never won a super bowl...although that doesn't impact my opinion that he was a good coach.

Cox was lifetime 500 games over.500. He is the fourth winningest manager in baseball history.

Over the last forty years, who was better? And if someone was better, what makes that manager better? More world series?
Eric Wedge is close
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2010, 01:56 PM
clyde's Avatar
clyde clyde is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Welsh Pride!
Posts: 13,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Eric Wedge is close
You think I would disagree with your tongue in Thebby---whoa!! ..I mean cheek remark?




No one has brought up Al Lopez.

40's and 50's,but most probably never heard of him like they probably have McGraw and some of the really old ones.

But a manager's ability to do so is always a function of team talent...in a large part,anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2010, 01:53 PM
horseofcourse horseofcourse is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 3,163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Over the last forty years, who was better? And if someone was better, what makes that manager better? More world series?
I'd go with Mike Hargrove. Without him cox and leyland would have zero combined championships! He's better because he made them genius'
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.