10/2 (BEL): JCGC, Hirsch, Flower Bowl, Beldame, Vosburgh (G1's)

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by Sightseek

Bleh.

The results made sense and were fairly predictable, especially knowing how retarded jocks are.

I thought Blame ran a pretty nice race all things considered.

Didn't they hit 6 in 113.4 or something around there?

You should be happy that Blame lost, as this makes it FAR more likely that Z will run in the BCC now.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

The results made sense and were fairly predictable, especially knowing how retarded jocks are.

I thought Blame ran a pretty nice race all things considered.

Didn't they hit 6 in 113.4 or something around there?

You should be happy that Blame lost, as this makes it FAR more likely that Z will run in the BCC now.

I couldn't agree more.

[Dahoss]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

I couldn't agree more.

I agree also. I thought Fly Down ran sneaky good too.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

I agree also. I thought Fly Down ran sneaky good too.

He did. I would be far from surprised if he gets a piece in the Classic.

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

The results made sense and were fairly predictable, especially knowing how retarded jocks are.

I thought Blame ran a pretty nice race all things considered.

Didn't they hit 6 in 113.4 or something around there?

You should be happy that Blame lost, as this makes it FAR more likely that Z will run in the BCC now.

It just wasn't a very fun race to watch.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by Sightseek

It just wasn't a very fun race to watch.

I thought it kinda was.

I've always been a bit of a fan of both Winchester and Haynesfield, so it was kind of neat to see them live up to, at least a little, what I thought they could do.

Winchester especially. I thought he was going to be a top horse after his win in the Secretariat. That seemed like five years ago.

I also thought Haynesfield might make some noise in the TC races last year. I was a bit off on that one.

My favorite type of horse is a fast one that is given an easy lead!

[johnny pinwheel]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

I thought it kinda was.

I've always been a bit of a fan of both Winchester and Haynesfield, so it was kind of neat to see them live up to, at least a little, what I thought they could do.

Winchester especially. I thought he was going to be a top horse after his win in the Secretariat. That seemed like five years ago.

I also thought Haynesfield might make some noise in the TC races last year. I was a bit off on that one.

My favorite type of horse is a fast one that is given an easy lead!

i liked winchester too. but i didn't like haynesfield...don't know why i didn't because the horse is a "horse for course" there.then again i did not think rail trip would let him get those fractions. dutrow was ga-ga over him this morning on tv so i though he would at least be a pace factor...24 and 3...113.1 should not even be legal on that track in a race like this.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by johnny pinwheel

i liked winchester too. but i didn't like haynesfield...don't know why i didn't because the horse is a "horse for course" there.then again i did not think rail trip would let him get those fractions. dutrow was ga-ga over him this morning on tv so i though he would at least be a pace factor...24 and 3...113.1 should not even be legal on that track in a race like this.

Rail Trip, his trip was a bit hard to figure for me. I couldn't tell if that was the jock, the surface switch, or soundness issues.

I wish NYRA would invest in cameras with zoom capability.

[Smooth Operator]

Ah, a NY bred son of a sprinter, no less, throws a gate-to-wire beatdown at the biggest (hell, it might be the only at this point) open 10f contest in the east.

There's still hope for QR in the BCC. lol



Gotta love that dirt racing........................

[hockey2315]

Richard's Kid wouldn't have hit the board.