Andy Reid ...

clyde · #1 09-21-2010, 10:03 PM

Comparing Vick to these guys is ridiculous.

Vick=Bobby Douglas.

MUCH bettah comparison.

jms62 · #2 09-22-2010, 04:47 AM

When Kolb does come back how effective will he be looking over his shoulder for the hook when he makes a bad play. Eagles unfortunately sold out their future for the short term.. My perdiction is Reid is done after this year.

Antitrust32 · #3 09-22-2010, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62

When Kolb does come back how effective will he be looking over his shoulder for the hook when he makes a bad play. Eagles unfortunately sold out their future for the short term.. My perdiction is Reid is done after this year.

Kolb got bent over on this one. One headache was all it took. Had he not been hurt, he'd still be the guy & we still would have beat Detriot (sorry slot)

Our o-line is just so bad, that had to be a major factor in this decision. Maybe Reid was doing Kolb a favor by not letting him become a vegetable.

Smooth Operator · #4 09-22-2010, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde

Comparing Vick to these guys is ridiculous.

Vick=Bobby Douglas.

MUCH bettah comparison.

Not comparing Mike to anyone, Mort

Just shooting down the claim that mobile qbs don't get rings

clyde · #5 09-22-2010, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Not comparing Mike to anyone, Mort

Just shooting down the claim that mobile qbs don't get rings

That's stupid.

They were all qb's first.

Being mobile was an added dimension.I think the point was that someone like Vick never won a ring.

3kings · #6 09-22-2010, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Not comparing Mike to anyone, Mort

Just shooting down the claim that mobile qbs don't get rings

He's not a mobile QB. He is a running QB who is an inaccurate passer, there is a big difference.

horseofcourse · #7 09-22-2010, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde

Comparing Vick to these guys is ridiculous.

Vick=Bobby Douglas.

MUCH bettah comparison.

Douglass---16-36-1
Vick--39-28-1 (postseason 2-2)

I think they're both ridiculous. But Vick is farther ahead of Douglass than he is behind Young.

clyde · #8 09-22-2010, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse

Douglass---16-36-1
Vick--39-28-1 (postseason 2-2)

I think they're both ridiculous. But Vick is farther ahead of Douglass than he is behind Young.

Just comparing their qb to running ratios.

Douglass' Bears teams were awful.