Unable to pass Senate confirmation, no problem, just sidestep it...

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by Nascar1966

I could care less if no one likes me here. I don't have to please anyone here.

While I usually don't agree with you, I do wish people would try to write mainly about a position on an issue. When people don't like others on here, they should communicate why the opposite position is the better position. You don't have to answer every lil insult thrown at you on here. If you do answer an insult, it'd be great if you'd try to provide more information supporting your own position on the topic at hand...... Also, given by itself, shocked amazement etc. (at what someone else says) does nothing to support a particular position. It's only an attempt to gather in those who crave a middle-ground position, but it's not informative. It's simply the equivalent of grabbing n' holding (in boxing etc.)

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

While I usually don't agree with you, I do wish people would try to write mainly about a position on an issue. When people don't like others on here, they should communicate why the opposite position is the better position. You don't have to answer every lil insult thrown at you on here. BTW, folks, shocked amazement etc. (at what someone else says) does nothing to support an argument. It's an attempt to gather in those who crave a middle-ground position, but it's not informative.

raising taxes duringa recession doesn't work scuds , please tell pelosi

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by gales0678

raising taxes duringa recession doesn't work scuds , please tell pelosi

We have no lack of rich people. The separation between the rich and everyone else is growing. The Wall Street Companies gave out 500k checks to every damn employee, and all your party can do is bitch n' moan when somebody honest has to finally be brought in to clean it up. I DO NOT THINK YOUR PARTY CARES ABOUT THE LONG TERM INTERESTS OF THE POOR, OR THE MIDDLE CLASS. These are usually the people that are 1st to die in our wars. Not the rich. Obama cares about these people. Problem is that he's sympathetic to the Muslims snowing him. You guys kick junior's ass this time, and we'll see if he brightens up some. Ain't that many Muslims voting. Junior's gunna get that message (and change,) or he'll be gone. He damn sure better care more about what we want, and less about what somebody in another country is "deeply upset over." I see way too much weak-ass appeasement (of rabid thugs) going on. This American Woman has to go into hiding, and he won't call a press conference to tell Muslims that they need to be tolerant of our 1st Amendment Rights? FK him. Beat his ass in November. We need some attitude adjustment here, and quick. Brother better find his butter. Promise you it ain't where he's lookin.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

We have no lack of rich people. The separation between the rich and everyone else is growing. The Wall Street Companies gave out 500k checks to every damn employee, and all your party can do is bitch n' moan when somebody honest has to finally be brought in to clean it up. I DO NOT THINK YOUR PARTY CARES ABOUT THE LONG TERM INTERESTS OF THE POOR, OR THE MIDDLE CLASS. These are usually the people that are 1st to die in our wars. Not the rich. Obama cares about these people. Problem is that he's sympathetic to the Muslims snowing him. You guys kick junior's ass this time, and we'll see if he brightens up some. Ain't that many Muslims voting. Junior's gunna get that message (and change,) or he'll be gone. He damn sure better care more about what we want, and less about what somebody in another country is "deeply upset over." I see way too much weak-ass appeasement (of rabid thugs) going on. This American Woman has to go into hiding, and he won't call a press conference to tell Muslims that they need to be tolerant of our 1st Amendment Rights? FK him. Beat his ass in November. We need some attitude adjustment here, and quick. Brother better find his butter. Promise you it ain't where he's lookin.

see that is where you are worng scuds

90% of the bonus $ goes to 10% of the staff

90% of employees of wall st frims make less than 75k a year

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by gales0678

see that is where you are worng scuds

90% of the bonus $ goes to 10% of the staff

90% of employees of wall st frims make less than 75k a year

Dude, in 2008 the Gov't bailed them out. In 2009, the average taxable bonus on Wall Street grew to $123,850. Payouts at three big banks — JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley — Rose 31 percent. The rest of the country is in a recession caused mainly by the practices of these type of people. Why would you ever want to keep giving them the Bush tax break? Also, why would you be against putting this lady in to stop this garbage? If it makes these pigs' money on Wallstreet worth less, then I have no problem running up the national debt. You think I want to balance the debt so that AIG execs money is worth more? AIG has hurt the typical American, and Obama is spending money on the typical American. Elect Republicans, and they will do all they can to raise THE BONUSES for execs everywhere, and to reduce the quality of life for the typical American. We know all this. Don't try to come on here and tell me that Republicans are out to help the typical American. They are out to help rich people. Period. That's your right, but don't lie about it. Your rich Wallstreet idols caused this hell, and you want them to keep getting their tax break. Telling me that we can't get out of this recession unless we keep giving them their tax break. I know this dance. If we have to keep giving them a tax break ( to get out of this recession,) then I don't want to get out of this recession.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Dude, in 2008 the Gov't bailed them out. In 2009, the average taxable bonus on Wall Street grew to $123,850. Payouts at three big banks — JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley — Rose 31 percent. The rest of the country is in a recession caused mainly by the practices of these type of people. Why would you ever want to keep giving them the Bush tax break? Also, why would you be against putting this lady in to stop this garbage? If it makes these pigs' money on Wallstreet worth less, then I have no problem running up the national debt. You think I want to balance the debt so that AIG execs money is worth more? AIG has hurt the typical American, and Obama is spending money on the typical American. Elect Republicans, and they will do all they can to raise THE BONUSES for execs everywhere, and to reduce the quality of life for the typical American. We know all this. Don't try to come on here and tell me that Republicans are out to help the typical American. They are out to help rich people. Period. That's your right, but don't lie about it. Your rich Wallstreet idols caused this hell, and you want them to keep getting their tax break. Telling me that we can't get out of this recession unless we keep giving them their tax break. I know this dance. If we have to keep giving them a tax break ( to get out of this recession,) then I don't want to get out of this recession.

scuds you are wrong , the avg wall st person , after you strip out the top 10% of each firm make less than a state employee , that's a fact , you got it wrong

the avg wall st employee is not doing as well as the state worker

the top wall st worker is doing better than anybody else , but we are talking about 500 -1000 people in a frim that has 25k

the other 24k are just getting by no worse or less than the rest of us

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by gales0678

scuds you are wrong , the avg wall st person , after you strip out the top 10% of each firm make less than a state employee , that's a fact , you got it wrong

the avg wall st employee is not doing as well as the state worker

the top wall st worker is doing better than anybody else , but we are talking about 500 -1000 people in a frim that has 25k

the other 24k are just getting by no worse or less than the rest of us

Wouldn't you agree that the 450 employees in AIGFP (AIG's Financial Products Division) got rewarded (even though the division had to be bailed out by the Gov't.) If you had stock in a company that tanked, I don't remember the Gov't bailing you out. Did they put the main culprits away for life? No? Then, somebody else will try to do it again. That's the way people do. So, I don't know how people can argue against this mother hen coming in with dynamite, and blowing the walls down. Niecy Nash on a Bulldozer (headed to the hoarder lady's house.)

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by gales0678

the top wall st worker is doing better than anybody else , but we are talking about 500 -1000 people in a frim that has 25k

Like you ain't brainwashed by them, and don't want to be the fat cat (getting over on us.) Why don't you stick to the populist issues of Illegal Immigration, and Obama's Appeasement of Muslim Aggression? Most people are doing poorly. They don't want to hear rich people (and their students) bitch about losing a tax break. You guys are just too greedy. You can't get out of your own way. You have 2 issues that he's been atrocious at. He's gotta be behind by about 30 points on those issues. You can't wait until after November (to get your rich people's tax cut?) Why do you think he got this lady to do this? He's baiting you to go against where most people are at on this. You should leave it alone (really.)

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by gales0678

see that is where you are worng scuds

90% of the bonus $ goes to 10% of the staff

90% of employees of wall st frims make less than 75k a year

AIGFP (AIG's Financial Products Division) had 450 employees in six offices around the world. How much did they each get? You think they were making 75k a year? How many billions of dollars did that division cost the tax payer? Still they gave these people millions in bonuses (paid with tax payer bail out money.) The division cost this country's tax payers billions, but they gave those employees millions in bonuses. You want to keep giving them tax breaks? We can't get out of the recession unless we keep tax breaks for the rich? Why do you even try with that load of crap?

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

AIGFP (AIG's Financial Products Division) had 450 employees in six offices around the world. How much did they each get? You think they were making 75k a year? How many billions of dollars did that division cost the tax payer? Still they gave these people millions in bonuses (paid with tax payer bail out money.) The division cost this country's tax payers billions, but they gave those employees millions in bonuses. You want to keep giving them tax breaks? We can't get out of the recession unless we keep tax breaks for the rich? Why do you even try with that load of crap?

again you are singling out a group within a company that was highly compensated

do you think the avg state worker is doing better than the guy who is in the middle of the pack at aig , remember they have 116,000 employees not 450

i think the state worker is doing much much better , that the guy making 65k a year with a 15k bonus