Go Broncos

Dahoss · #1 09-08-2010, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

now to find someone to end the absurd talk of the boise st smurfs playing for it.

Boise St is the Zenyatta of college football.

clyde · #2 09-08-2010, 12:43 AM

OOOOOOOOOO

miraja2 · #3 09-08-2010, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Boise St is the Zenyatta of college football.

Going all the way across the country to play Virginia Tech sort of disqualifies them for that distinction. They also won seven games last year by over 30 points.
If they played 90% of their games at home....and beat teams like new Mexico St. and San Jose St. by 3 points every time....maybe.

#4 09-08-2010, 09:04 AM

I can't wait until Alabama plays Boise St. in the BCS championship.

RockHardTen1985 · #5 09-08-2010, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

I can't wait until Alabama plays Boise St. in the BCS championship.

63-6

miraja2 · #6 09-08-2010, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

63-6

^
Predicted a Kansas-Ole Miss title game last Friday.

ddthetide · #7 09-08-2010, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

63-6

as long as bsu is allowed to play big teams with 6 weeks or 6 months to prepare, they'll have a chance to win.
i heard on the radio that Nebraska tried to sign a 3 yr deal bsu. 2 in Nebraska 1 @ bsu. bsu wanted the second game at Neb to be a neutral site. Neb said no, and Neb. wanted to play in the middle of the season and bsu said no.
who does bsu think they are to call thier shots against the big boys? i don't want to hear no one will play them, it's not true.

hoovesupsideyourhead · #8 09-08-2010, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide

as long as bsu is allowed to play big teams with 6 weeks or 6 months to prepare, they'll have a chance to win.
i heard on the radio that Nebraska tried to sign a 3 yr deal bsu. 2 in Nebraska 1 @ bsu. bsu wanted the second game at Neb to be a neutral site. Neb said no, and Neb. wanted to play in the middle of the season and bsu said no.
who does bsu think they are to call thier shots against the big boys? i don't want to hear no one will play them, it's not true.

if trent gets hurt before ingram gets back they will lose a game

#9 09-08-2010, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

if trent gets hurt before ingram gets back they will lose a game

Uh no.

ddthetide · #10 09-08-2010, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

if trent gets hurt before ingram gets back they will lose a game

Lacy and Goode can step up. might slow the offense down abit but they'll be ok.
i talked to my tv buddy in T-town, MI may not play until after next weeks duke game.

-BT- · #11 09-09-2010, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide

as long as bsu is allowed to play big teams with 6 weeks or 6 months to prepare, they'll have a chance to win.
i heard on the radio that Nebraska tried to sign a 3 yr deal bsu. 2 in Nebraska 1 @ bsu. bsu wanted the second game at Neb to be a neutral site. Neb said no, and Neb. wanted to play in the middle of the season and bsu said no.
who does bsu think they are to call thier shots against the big boys? i don't want to hear no one will play them, it's not true.

when did nebraska become a shot caller again?

they took on the #10 team in the nation basically in their back yard.... i don't think they're ducking programs as much as they just want home and homes probably, who the F wants to go to boise, idaho in nov.?

-bt-

ateamstupid · #12 09-11-2010, 04:13 PM

Kev must be in heaven now.

Cannon Shell · #13 09-12-2010, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ddthetide

as long as bsu is allowed to play big teams with 6 weeks or 6 months to prepare, they'll have a chance to win.
i heard on the radio that Nebraska tried to sign a 3 yr deal bsu. 2 in Nebraska 1 @ bsu. bsu wanted the second game at Neb to be a neutral site. Neb said no, and Neb. wanted to play in the middle of the season and bsu said no.
who does bsu think they are to call thier shots against the big boys? i don't want to hear no one will play them, it's not true.

Why should they go 2 for 1 against nebraska? This aint 1985 anymore.

and Darren....they ARE one of the big boys now. No one wants play them, especially in Idaho. Think any of the vaunted SEC teams would ever venture onto the blue field when Jacksonville state is available? C'mon give them their due. Under the theory you guys operate on the NCAA basketball tourney should be reduced to 8 teams and lesser conference teams like Memphis and Butler shouldn't be invited. I read a story today stating that even though the writer had them ranked as the 2nd best team in the country because JMU beat Va Tech, Boise shouldn't play in the nat'l championship game. What kind of ****in logic dictates that the 2nd best team in the country shouldn't play in the title game because of what another team does? If they are so unworthy then what is the big deal? They will get killed in the championship game anyway? Right? They are the best thing that has happened to college football in that their continued success will eventually force a change to a playoff.

miraja2 · #14 09-12-2010, 08:29 AM

After yesterday it might be fair to ask if the WAC is that much worse than the ACC this year.

VA Tech lost to FCS James Madison.
GA Tech lost to Kansas....who was coming off a 6-3 loss to an FCS school.
Florida St didn't even belong on the same field as Oklahoma
and while Virginia and Miami weren't horrible in games against talented opponents....they still lost.

Clemson, on the other hand, did manage to to follow up their Week1 win over the always-dominant North Texas with a Week2 score over mighty Presbyterian.

So let's say (hypothetically) that Clemson runs the table and goes undefeated and there is only one other major-conference unbeaten....we'll say Oklahoma. Does Clemson deserve a shot at the championship game or should they, like Boise, be passed over by a one-loss SEC team, because the ACC sucks?