![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's horseracing, logic is not one of their strengths.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() They will be out of jobs next.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What's the problem? With S Cal tracks going back to dirt, all the POLY losers will become DIRT winners, AGAIN.
![]() Surely they can withstand a couple of percentage points increase. It's all good in DIRTland. ![]() Repeat after me: 'The real problem in racing is POLY'. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I always love these arguments
Under the proposed increases, California’s takeout for more complex exotic bets would still be lower than other jurisdictions. ] Except less, pay more but learn to like it because someone else has it shi_ttier than you .
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Enjoy it while you can, rubber will be a thing of the past soon at all but WO and TP.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() TP may soon be a thing of the past
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If it gets Batagglia away from calling races, I'm all for it.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Are these serious comments or just sarcasm? Losing TP for the winter meeting would be devasting for the thoroughbred industry in Kentucky. Thats alot of people without jobs. Truly sad.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ap too
|