|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
07-29-2010, 04:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I like this initiative, but that really wasn't much of an explanation re: the inquiry in the 9th. All the screen read was "there was alleged interference, after watching the video, the result stood." That doesn't really help.
|
|
#2
07-29-2010, 05:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I find it puzzling that they didn't think enough of what was evident trouble in the pan shot to even call this inquiry. Clearly the 9 intimidated and then cut off the 4.
|
|
#3
07-29-2010, 07:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there!
|
Hybrid Mode
