Saturday Beyers

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I was stating facts. I have read the **** he posts, I have pm'd him about taking **** down and he blames you, so that makes you both clowns. The pm's I posted, are those lies? Am I lying about reading his **** late at night?

You jumped to these conclusions from those PMs? This is saying a lot, but you may be dumber than Coach Pants.

Originally Posted by cmorioles

You jumped to these conclusions from those PMs? This is saying a lot, but you may be dumber than Coach Pants.

^^

[cmorioles]

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

Dont blame this one on me, this thread took a horrible turn before I said anything.

[herkhorse]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Dont blame this one on me, this thread took a horrible turn before I said anything.

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

I'm worrying about philcski's personal life at the moment.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Now that CP has capitulated and RHT is giving out throwouts in the Sunday play around thread, maybe we can get back to the Beyers.

What should Blind Luck get, and why? Phil says 115, but I'm sure even he knows deep down that is absurd. I think it might be a few points low at 94, but no more than that.

I said give the number whatever the right number by the difference in time is. I just did the Beyers for the card by the book and here's what I got. Left out the off the turf allowance at 9F and the 5F last race.

R1 STR 12.5K 1 Mi 70y 77
R2 MCL 10K 6F 50
R3 STR 5K 1 Mi 16th 72
R4 CLM 5K N3L 6F 69
R5 MCL 10K 6F 57
R6 CLM 5K N3L 6F 63
R7 Barbaro Stakes 1 Mi 16th 90
R9 Delaware Oaks 1 Mi 16th 110
R10 Sussex Stakes (off turf) 1 Mi 16th 87

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by philcski

I said give the number whatever the right number by the difference in time is. I just did the Beyers for the card by the book and here's what I got. Left out the off the turf allowance at 9F and the 5F last race.

R1 STR 12.5K 1 Mi 70y 77
R2 MCL 10K 6F 50
R3 STR 5K 1 Mi 16th 72
R4 CLM 5K N3L 6F 69
R5 MCL 10K 6F 57
R6 CLM 5K N3L 6F 63
R7 Barbaro Stakes 1 Mi 16th 90
R9 Delaware Oaks 1 Mi 16th 110
R10 Sussex Stakes (off turf) 1 Mi 16th 87

Cool. I'll post mine tomorrow and see what the differences are, and we can go from there if there are any.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Cool. I'll post mine tomorrow and see what the differences are, and we can go from there if there are any.

same bat time, same bat channel....

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by Danzig

same bat time, same bat channel....

Yeah, I'm not trying to be dramatic, I just haven't done them yet. I always do weekend numbers on Monday and Tuesday when it is slow.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Cool. I'll post mine tomorrow and see what the differences are, and we can go from there if there are any.

I never do Delaware so that is not accounting for any quirks they may have in their specific distances. Also, I think you'll agree the 5F race and the 3 horse 9F off the turfer are pretty useless in determining the rest of the card.