Saturday Beyers

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by philcski

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...7&postcount=39
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...5&postcount=63
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...1&postcount=66

Then, shortly after that, I get a snarky, and unexplained, comment:
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...53&postcount=5

Perhaps I was reading too much into it.

I like(d) you too, CJ. Always been a fan of your knowledge and approach to the game. However, I thought it was cowardly when you expressed commentary HERE elsewhere. We don't need Steve to bring up old posts because what I said was certainly not inflammatory, or at least enough to warrant this type of anger on your part and his part.

I said I didn't have the specific numbers, but I guess technically I was wrong, I can live with that. I still know it is much easier to show a paper profit at smaller tracks with small pools than it is at larger ones. I just don't have time right now to do all the research with about 50 tracks running a week. Come winter I can revisit that.

As for the unexplained comment, I forgot about it. Drugs went fishing with another "hey, look at me thread", without mentioning specifics. He reeled you right in. He was begging to be asked why DeShawn Parker was important.

If it wasn't inflammatory, why was it deleted?

[philcski]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

If it wasn't inflammatory, why was it deleted?

Everybody's comments were deleted. There were about 10 posts removed. I don't question Steve's decisions on these things because he basically allows us to self govern this site.

Originally Posted by cmorioles

As for the unexplained comment, I forgot about it. Drugs went fishing with another hey, look at me thread, without mentioning specifics. He reeled you right in.

That is fine. Usually it's an interesting story, coming from Drugs.

Why was it deleted? Probably some PM's and/or e-mails about it.