![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What about the blown call in the bottom of the 8th that allowed Detroit to score 2 additional runs and make it 3-0 going to the 9th rather than 1-0??. Why is nobody talking about that?? Reversing the call would be the biggest travesty in the history of baseball. It would be disgraceful. You can't do it. Why not reverse the '85 Orta safe call and have a bunch of 60 year old men go replay the World Series from that point on...no?? A blown call is a blown call be it in the 2nd inning of a 12-0 game or with 2 outs in the 9th of a potential perfect game.
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() doesn't matter. There's been lots of blown calls. You simply can't reverse one single call based on when the blown call occurred. It is completely nonsensical in any debate on the subject. As others have said, use it to go to replay henceforth or accept it as a blown call as every other blown call in major league history has been accepted.
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
So now we want to add one with an asterisk? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm sure some people will want an asterisk, but why? Did you see the replay?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah, it was a blown call and it sucks. I feel bad for the guy (and the ump). But that is baseball and hopefully this blown call leads to instant replay but I don't really like the idea of retroactively changing calls. Are they going to go back to every game in the MLB library where the pitcher had 26 straight outs before giving up a hit and check that every single one was truly a hit? Then what, do we have to look at no hitters next? Shutouts? Should anyone that hit .398 or .399 in a season have all their hits reviewed to see if there were any they were robbed of by a bad call and we should now give them a .400 season?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not because of bad calls.
|