Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2010, 12:23 AM
copying copying is offline
Suffolk Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateamstupid View Post
That's mighty hard to do when you've never read a fraction in your life.
You clearly don't understand. That is exactly what I'm trying to say. If you rely on Durkin to tell you "Oh! the half in '46" - that doesn't tell you a damn thing - maidens may run the half in 46; the track plays differently day to day.
You need to know who is right behind, tugging on the reins, looking for room, full of run etc. Who's running easily, who is being pushed, who is all out. Telling you what happened is useless. Tell me what's about to happen.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-2010, 02:40 PM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copying View Post
You need to know who is right behind, tugging on the reins, looking for room, full of run etc. Who's running easily, who is being pushed, who is all out. Telling you what happened is useless. Tell me what's about to happen.
You forgot to mention that we also need to know who.....would....have....to.....sprout......WINGS. ....to catch so and so.


In my opinion, Denman is one of the worst announcers in the sport.

Durkin was fantastic in the 80s and 90s, and I still like him, but he has lost a bit over the last ten years or so. I like Dooley the best now, but the CD guy is really good too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-2010, 03:44 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by copying View Post
You clearly don't understand. That is exactly what I'm trying to say. If you rely on Durkin to tell you "Oh! the half in '46" - that doesn't tell you a damn thing - maidens may run the half in 46; the track plays differently day to day.
You need to know who is right behind, tugging on the reins, looking for room, full of run etc. Who's running easily, who is being pushed, who is all out. Telling you what happened is useless. Tell me what's about to happen.
So if you bet on a frontrunner in a claiming race and the quarter has gone 21 flat and the half 43, you don't want to know that your horse is almost certain to back up in the stretch? Or if you bet the closer in the same race, you don't want to know that the same fractions are setting your horse up for a big run?

We can see a horse during a race and whether the rider is sitting still or pushing the horse or whether the horse is getting a bad trip, but we can't always see the fractions. I suppose that information is useful when you are for some reason only hearing the race without watching it, but where does that really happen other than ATR or when TVG is on Sirius. While time is not everything, it can certainly give clues as to who is getting the best and worst of it that many, including me wish to know.

BTW, personally, I leave the east coast, west coast thing to Rappers.

Last edited by pointman : 05-25-2010 at 04:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2010, 04:09 PM
NTamm1215 NTamm1215 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,629
Default

I'm kind of neutral on the fractions, especially if you're watching the track feed.

However, Trevor Denman makes proclamations about what's going on that are wrong way too often. He tends to anticipate moves that don't occur, he'll shift his focus to a horse who he THINKS is making the winning move only to hang. Besides, and I'm recycling this joke, his street sense when noticing who's coming up the rail leaves something to be desired.

Tom Durkin may be past his prime but no one captures the moment in a big race the way he has for the last nearly 30 years. You'll never find a Trevor Denman call that's 1/2 as exciting as the 2002 Test. Trevor would have s.hit the bed in the stretch of the 1998 Belmont and there's no way Trevor would have been able to illustrate for a wide audience what was going on in the 2004 Belmont. Not to mention that Durkin's call of the 2005 Derby was about as flawless a call as you're ever going to find.

On a daily basis he's not nearly as crisp as before, he's much more prone to error but Durkin's 2nd to none in my opinion.

NT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2010, 04:50 PM
jballscalls's Avatar
jballscalls jballscalls is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: renton, washington
Posts: 484
Default

it's so funny how many observations on this thread are dead opposite to what i think and some are exactly. goes to show you taste in announcers is subjective as tastes in ice cream.

i've never gotten the "i can't understand trevor" i mean, he's speaking english, i can't say i've ever had to double take on something he said.

i also thought vic's sound and style was far more like durkin than trevor, even though someone stated the opposite earlier.

all the guys at the big tracks do an amazing job, and i think most of us small track guys do a good job. it's just different tastes for different folks i guess.
__________________
You can buy my horse racing/gambling novel Southbound at Amazon, BN, or Powells or various bookstores.

On twitter @BeemieAwards
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.