![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Dana's Bell figured to show speed. But once she doesn't, one of the other morons (namely Corny) has to realize that and use their horse a little bit. Like you said, It's Not for Love is a quitter and you've got a better shot pressing the pace and trying to hold off the closers than you do of reeling in a loose leader from the back. These clowns don't understand that for some reason.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 5 buck tri belmont 7/1/2 race 8
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Nice job Alan. Look back a few more times before you get nailed at the wire.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() hes pretty good joe ill give em a pass this time..
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It was pretty funny to watch actually. I've never seen a jockey go from "confidently looking back for competition" to "furiously whipping and driving" so quickly.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Like the cutback, Lemon Shore, in the the 9th. Don't like Luzzi, however. If he gets a little closer to 10:1, will try him to win.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Woodbine Race 3
$5 EX 3 / 6,7,8,11 $20 GL |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() WO R4:
ebox: 5 / 6 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Woodbine 4th ex 4/1-6
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The horse you don't want back between the 4, 5, and 6 from last time is the 4. Of course, the 2 wasn't exactly 'likable'
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Why not the 4 fats?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The 4 ran after the 5 did. The 5 make a relatively premature move and still won the race. I got sucked into the 6, because she got stopped twice in the race. This is after I've gone on and on about how horses that get stopped have an advantage. As it was, I'd never have used the 2.
R5: TRI: 4 / 2, 6 / 2, 6 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() race 6 WO
2.00 tri key 9/1267 |