Kagan ?

[Danzig]

Maybe I'm just in a foul mood but I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Maybe I'm just in a foul mood but I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

No one said Scalia was Brad Pitt? She's a mess to look at but I don't care. Do the job.

[Danzig]

I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by Danzig

I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

Not true. Women couldn't see through that phony Edwards b/c they liked his appearance.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

Not true. Women couldn't see through that phony Edwards b/c they liked his appearance.

i think her point was that every woman goes through this. one opposing example doesn't defeat that point.

i'd throw in the towel on this one. she's right. and you know she's right.

why argue?

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i think her point was that every woman goes through this. one opposing example doesn't defeat that point.

i'd throw in the towel on this one. she's right. and you know she's right.

why argue?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i think her point was that every woman goes through this. one opposing example doesn't defeat that point.

i'd throw in the towel on this one. she's right. and you know she's right.

why argue?

Thanks god. I'd apologize for the blasphemy but you'd know it wasn't sincere

And I thought edwards looked like a sleazy used car salesman!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

'DILF' is all to do with 'hope' and nothing to do with realty. If it ever did it would then be called 'DD' as in 'Done Deal'.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Danzig

I don't recall any comments about a guys looksa in a similar situation. None. Obama was questioned about experience. Palin was talked about as being a milf. Can't remember ever seeing a reference to a 'dilf'.

i think Palin was talked about being a milf because that her only good quality.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Maybe I'm just in a foul mood but I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

That's how you know Zig's mad. She starts using capital letters.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

That's how you know Zig's mad. She starts using capital letters.

lol

no, that's how you know i'm on the blackberry. it automatically does that...so annoying!!

[SOREHOOF]

Just what America needs, another Harvard genius like the ones who have been running what's left of this country for the past 30 years.

Whatever.

[ArlJim78]

I didn't think I would see another nominee as week as Harriet Miers, but sure enough here we go. Of course if you want to send up a radical socialist you would tend to go with a person with little record to go on. Most likely another trojan horse like Obama.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Senator Inofe is opposing her. That is no surprise but I think he makes some good points. Here is a piece of what he had to say about her:

“While her service as the Dean of Harvard Law School is an impressive credential, decisions she made in that role demonstrated poor judgment. While there, she banned the U.S. military from recruiting on campus, an issue very important to me. She took the issue even further when she joined with other law school officials in a lawsuit to overturn the Solomon amendment, which was adopted by Congress to ensure that schools could not deny military recruiters access to college campuses. Claiming the Solomon Amendment was ‘immoral,’ she filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. F.A.I.R opposing the Amendment. The Court unanimously ruled against her position and affirmed that the Solomon Amendment was constitutional."

That is from Senator Inofe's website.

http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/inde...6-e0c7020cdff5

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

Senator Inofe is opposing her. That is no surprise but I think he makes some good points. Here is a piece of what he had to say about her:

“While her service as the Dean of Harvard Law School is an impressive credential, decisions she made in that role demonstrated poor judgment. While there, she banned the U.S. military from recruiting on campus, an issue very important to me. She took the issue even further when she joined with other law school officials in a lawsuit to overturn the Solomon amendment, which was adopted by Congress to ensure that schools could not deny military recruiters access to college campuses. Claiming the Solomon Amendment was ‘immoral,’ she filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. F.A.I.R opposing the Amendment. The Court unanimously ruled against her position and affirmed that the Solomon Amendment was constitutional."

That is from Senator Inofe's website.

http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/inde...6-e0c7020cdff5

I have a ton of respect for her doing that.. and I love the military.

DADT is embarassingly immoral.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Danzig

lol

no, that's how you know i'm on the blackberry. it automatically does that...so annoying!!

TEAM BLACKBERRY!!!

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by Danzig

I get so goddamned tired of the typical bashing that occurs with female nominees. She isn't attractive, she's masculine. Now we just need that she looks like a bitch for it to be complete. Ridiculous. Think about what is said about a nomd guy, and then the posts above. Think of what most remarks are about palin, or hillary and cankles. So frustrating!!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by miraja2

lol
thanks miraja. i actually had a guy say the other day he couldn't handle being with someone like me-i'm too 'feisty'. lmao. his wife is great, but she's far from feisty.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by Danzig

lol
thanks miraja.

Well, everything you said is entirely accurate. The blatantly sexist way in which a strikingly large number of people (primarily, but not exclusively, men) respond in situations like this is ridiculous.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by miraja2

Well, everything you said is entirely accurate. The blatantly sexist way in which a strikingly large number of people (primarily, but not exclusively, men) respond in situations like this is ridiculous.

Wow never knew pointing out lack of experience was sexist.