![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I mean you are right here but the thing is these "fans", the once a year types, if they're not the main group who should be targeted who is? The Nielsens are a joke. A dinosaur. I don't believe X million watched because they're as outdated as vhs tapes but whatever the true number is? The real X million? They need to be brought in. Food and clothes... what is that, an effort to cater to women? That's insulting. I refuse to be grateful that there's any coverage when it's this much of a joke. Portray racing as what it was or what we want it to be. Show it as a mental puzzle, a physical thing of beauty, the sport of kings for God sake... a little bit of grandure left over from a century ago. There'e history, excitement... profit. That part is hard to show but the thing is if it's not shoved down peoples throats... if you get them hooked they WILL (I feel like tfm when I do that ![]() ... and they'll bet more and more... Every once in a while I'll post that I'm from the Smarty era. This sounds stupid but it's true, it's my truth, and I know quite a few people who, like me, had zero interest in horse racing until the one two punch... Seabiscuit and Smarty. With racing-themed tv shows and films coming out this is the perfect time to attract new fans and what happens? It's treated like some secondary reason for a talk show. It's outrageous and almost degrading. LIke I said I didn't watch this year but I've watched enough in the past to know that the race is one of the last things that's focused on. If we can't get new people, new bettors, from this audience interested, where do they come from? The occassional couple of people who are brought to the track to experience it? It's a nice thought but it's not going to bring in the numbers racing needs. TV is still good for a few things which is why it's so f****** aggravating when it's done in such a manner as the NBC broadcasts always seem to be. I don't know... maybe some savvy industry professionals could step up and demand that NBC (at least) take note. It doesn't mean they will but at least make them aware of the problem with their ridiculous broadcast. It's a first step... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frank Stronach was on the right path when he had those Frank's drink bimbos at Gulfstream. Bring more hot women to the track and that will bring guys who get drunk. Drunk = higher probability of gambling.
Pi.ss on the fashion shows. Put hot women in bikinis and they will cu...err come. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Why don't we just get cheerleaders for each race? Gulfstream Gals; Churchill chicks; Santa Anita Sluts, etc... THEN you will cu... errr come. ![]()
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken. ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() How about the Suffolk Downs Suckfuk go Downers?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() A gentleman and a scholar, as I've already said. ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() NBC coverage started at 4.. race didnt start til 630. There is only so much "human uninterested in their stories" out there. I personally am a fan of showing hot chicks in dresses for 2 hours. Though I agree with your suggestion more.
__________________
|