huck-gay=incest

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

You took "so sad," and turned it into "Maybe we should kill them or censor them or something." This intentional distortion is not a valid point, or argument of any sort. Once you've distorted the facts, you then turn to distraction ("Jesus christ liberals are natural pu.ssies.") Why can't you simply talk about the subject at hand? Is it because your view is hard to support with an argument? Doesn't hold water?

Was Huck's opinion (on these issues) well known during the Presidential Election?

I'll quote both posters the next time just to help the slow people out. I'll also put sarcasm tags.