DRF is really starting to suck!

[Left Bank]

Originally Posted by Gaining Ground

i dont think this part is true.

Bullshit! Every graded stakes had the complete record of each horse,and this was stopped by them not long ago.I have the issue with With Anticipation's full racing record from when he ran in the Sword Dancer in 2002 sitting right in front of me.

[Gaining Ground]

Originally Posted by Left Bank

Bullshit! Every graded stakes had the complete record of each horse,and this was stopped by them not long ago.I have the issue with With Anticipation's full racing record from when he ran in the Sword Dancer in 2002 sitting right in front of me.

i dont think you are being truthful here. no biggie. but every single graded stakes race did not feature the entire full race record of every horse. i agree, it has gotten pricey. i just know what you are saying isnt totally truthful.

[Thunder Gulch]

I don't remember if it was every graded race, but I do remember for major graded stakes that the did publish the full racing record. I haven't used DRF in ten years. They have made some modest improvements to their publication, but there are better products with better information readily available, and I'm not just talking about the "sheet" style formats of Rags, Thorograph, Equiform. Brisnet and Trackmaster have superior "traditional" formats that you can download and customize. When I look at a DRF now, I feel like I'm stuck in the 80's.

[hockey2315]

Originally Posted by Left Bank

.

They haven't published full running lines since at least 2006 (except for the BC) - I don't know about before that. If you really want to look that far back (sometimes that's helpful, usually it's worthless) then use Formulator.