Good Article About Clinton

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

The thing that is so ridiculous about the Clinton interview is that the liberals actually think that Wallace did something wrong. They think he was out of line and Clinton put him in his place. That is absurd. What did Wallace do wrong? Wallace was very respectful and he asked a fair question. He didn't attack Clinton. He asked him if he felt that they did enough with regard to Bin Laden. That's not a legitmate question? What are you guys thinking?

The reason everyone is making a big deal about the interview is because Clinton got so angry over nothing. Why would a guy get so mad about a fairly easy and predictable question. Have you guys ever watched Face the Nation? Have you heard the questions that Tim Russert asks to guys like Rumsfeld and Cheney? He asks them much more confrontational questions than Wallace asked? They don't get angry. They answer the questions.

i think it was a legit question as well! clinton could very easily have sat there and stated all those times they almost got bin laden, could have outlined all the things they did, or attempted to do. instead he got defensive as hell...he even tried to say wallace was part of some bigger 'conspiracy' type thing against clinton. what a nut he seemd to be. and yeah, i agree with oracle. exact same serious look and finger wag. i did not have....blah blah. he's a pathological liar.