![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Betting and watching stars race are two different entities to me. I'll be interested in watching a 6 horse GI with a "star", but that's not going to make me want to bet another 6 horse field.
Give me more 9-10 horse Aoc $50000 or even 10 horses running for a $20000 tag if you want more $$ from me. The sport needs more gamblers, and do a better job of keeping gamblers. Gamblers want an opportunity to make $$, which happens with less takeout and some tracks falling by the wayside(or maybe less racing days per week for some). |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Each state that wants to keep Horse racing needs to to give tax incentives to the owners and find some way to subsidize the purses to the point that you have a chance to make some money as an owner.
Reduce the take out. Make it a level playing field for all gaming within the state. The Indian Casinos in California have it all over Horse racing. Workmans comp insurance alone will run you out of business in this state. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had time to think about this today. Track marketing departments need to buy the mailing lists and whatever else they can get from the nearest defunct dogtracks and sports teams, along with whatever data they can bribe away from their state and local health departments, and BLAST those people with as many promos and junk mail and phone calls as they can. This is the demographic you are trying to reach if you want GAMBLERS. In a perfect world, there WOULD be a lottery tie-in also.
|