Stretching the field...

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

In case you haven't noticed, the Redskins have played way better of late. In the past five weeks, they've beaten the Broncos, lost heartbreakers on the road against Dallas and Philly, crushed Oakland and should've beaten New Orleans. It's a different team. You can't possibly think the Pats are even close to the Saints.

Gimme a break - the Pats were like a 1 point underdog in that game against the Saints - and it was a night game in New Orleans on Thanksgiving weekend.

Let's say the Saints played NE in NE next week ... I'm not so sure the Pats wouldn't be favored by a couple points.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Gimme a break - the Pats were like a 1 point underdog in that game against the Saints - and it was a night game in New Orleans on Thanksgiving weekend.

Let's say the Saints played NE in NE next week ... I'm not so sure the Pats wouldn't be favored by a couple points.

pats would be favored over any team in the nfl dec/jan in foxboro becuase the $$$ would dictate that , remember vegas wants 50/50 action so they can collect the vig

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Gimme a break - the Pats were like a 1 point underdog in that game against the Saints - and it was a night game in New Orleans on Thanksgiving weekend.

Let's say the Saints played NE in NE next week ... I'm not so sure the Pats wouldn't be favored by a couple points.

Who gives a sh it what the spread was or if it was Thanksgiving? What does that have to do with anything when the Pats got massacred and have looked just as terrible since? Trust me, if the Saints are laying 7 1/2 to the Vegas darlings this week, there's no way in hell they'd be underdogs against a team that was just life and death to beat the Panthers at home.

Even if they were somehow underdogs, again that's irrelevant. The Pats are total pretenders buddy. Even the Massholes at Pats Pulpit and Bill Simmons realize this.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

there's no way in hell they'd be underdogs against a team that was just life and death to beat the Panthers at home.

Weren't the Panthers like the NFC's #1 or #2 seed last year? They don't have a bad defense ... Jake the Turnover machine is the reason why their record isn't so hot. He didn't play.

Anyway - the Pats are 18-0 at home when both Brady and Moss play. They beat the living piss out of Arizona in the snow with Cassell last year - and they beat Tenneesse 59-0 - in what some suggested might have been the most statistically lopsided game in NFL history - during an unexpected snow storm this year.

If you think a dome team from both the NFC and the South is going to come into New England at this time of the year and be a favored in the betting ... you're crazy.

[gales0678]

[quote=The Indomitable DrugS]Weren't the Panthers like the NFC's #1 or #2 seed last year? They don't have a bad defense ... Jake the Turnover machine is the reason why their record isn't so hot. He didn't play.

Anyway - the Pats are 18-0 at home when both Brady and Moss play. They beat the living piss out of Arizona in the snow with Cassell last year - and they beat Tenneesse 59-0 - in what some suggested might have been the most statistically lopsided game in NFL history - during an unexpected snow storm this year.

If you think a dome team from both the NFC and the South is going to come into New England at this time of the year and be a favored in the betting ... you're crazy.[/QUOTE]


NE wil be favored but it's irrelavant , if they see them at all it will be in the sunshine state where there def will be grasping for air

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Weren't the Panthers like the NFC's #1 or #2 seed last year? They don't have a bad defense ... Jake the Turnover machine is the reason why their record isn't so hot. He didn't play.

Anyway - the Pats are 18-0 at home when both Brady and Moss play. They beat the living piss out of Arizona in the snow with Cassell last year - and they beat Tenneesse 59-0 - in what some suggested might have been the most statistically lopsided game in NFL history - during an unexpected snow storm this year.

If you think a dome team from both the NFC and the South is going to come into New England at this time of the year and be a favored in the betting ... you're crazy.

Your ability to move the goal posts, ignore obvious facts, cherry pick games and stats and change the point of discussion is breathtaking. So much so that I find it hard to believe you're not one of the Zenyatta for HOY tards.

However good the Pats are at home is pretty much a moot point when they can't beat anyone on the road and won't have more than two more games in Foxboro the rest of the season. You should probably hope they survive in Buffalo (the team that pretty much beat them in Foxboro this year) before worrying about the Saints.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Your ability to move the goal posts, ignore obvious facts, cherry pick games and stats and change the point of discussion is breathtaking.

Yes.

Thank you for noticing.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Weren't the Panthers like the NFC's #1 or #2 seed last year? They don't have a bad defense ... Jake the Turnover machine is the reason why their record isn't so hot. He didn't play.

Anyway - the Pats are 18-0 at home when both Brady and Moss play. They beat the living piss out of Arizona in the snow with Cassell last year - and they beat Tenneesse 59-0 - in what some suggested might have been the most statistically lopsided game in NFL history - during an unexpected snow storm this year.

If you think a dome team from both the NFC and the South is going to come into New England at this time of the year and be a favored in the betting ... you're crazy.

remember the cards were 8-8 last year , check out their 4 games on the east coast and tell me what they did

surely you understand they shut it down in that game before they even took the field as the divison was already wrapped up and they weren't moving up in the seedings

as for tenn this year , what does 59-0 really mean when VY didn't start

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Wasn't Tennessee like the #1 seed in the AFC last year without Vince Young starting?

They played like a highschool team would have rolled them

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Wasn't Tennessee like the #1 seed in the AFC last year without Vince Young starting?

They played like a highschool team would have rolled them

what does last year have to do with this year?

ok lets say they get in as the 6 seed on luck

care to give me 59 pts in the rematch?

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Titans PASSING stats for that game against New England

Collins 2-for-12, -7 yards 1 INT
Young 0-for-2, 0 yards 1 INT

The Titans QB's went a combined 2-for-14 for negative 7 yards passing and 2 INT's !!

They completed as many passes to NE's defense as they did to their own offense. And considering the two completions resulted in negative 7 yards - they'd have been better off being incompletions.

As for the stats of the Pats QB's ....

Brady 29/34 380 6TD 0INT
Hoyer 9/11 52 0TD 0 INT

The score was 59-0 halfway through the 3rd quarter !!!

Anyway ... like I said ... that game is as much of a reflection of how good the Pats are - as the Saints game is a reflection of how bad the Pats are.