![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() So no big deal?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
can't help but think it'd be a huge deal if the roles were reversed. had any skeptics been outed, there'd be attention for days. this thread would be ten pages long by now. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() [quote]
Quote:
Quote:
Data wasn't "doctored" in the manner the politicos imply (as to alter outcome). As I said, infighting among scientists is pretty common. There are not "alot of scientists" on "the other side" of the data. The vast, overwhelming conclusion of the majority of scientific experts in all associated specialities throughout the world, over the past 20-30 years, is most obviously that climate change and significant global warming are obviously real. The only mistake they have made is that it appears to be progressing faster than anticipated.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts Last edited by Riot : 11-26-2009 at 10:02 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() [quote=Riot]
Quote:
Take away funding for these scientists and the hubris disappears until the next random weather event occurs at least. The fact there is a billion dollar industry that drives the humans affect/cause golbal warming makes ANY proof that the whole thing is overstated fair game for thier side to attempt to discredit that proof or evidence. The more the real push behind the global warming crowd is exposed, the less the general public will believe. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() [quote=Cannon Shell]
Quote:
|